Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Comparison of adenoma detection rate between three-dimensional and standard colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Title: Comparison of adenoma detection rate between three-dimensional and standard colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Authors: Chang, Wei-Yuan; Liao, Wei-Chih; Chang, Li-Chun; Lin, Hsuan-Ho; Wei, Pin-Ya; Wu, Hsing-Chien; Chiu, Han-Mo; Wu, Ming-Shiang
Contributors: MedicalTek Co. Ltd, Taiwan.
Source: Endoscopy ; volume 57, issue 10, page 1085-1094 ; ISSN 0013-726X 1438-8812
Publisher Information: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Publication Year: 2025
Description: Improvement in adenoma detection rates (ADRs) effectively reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer. In a simulation study, three-dimensional (3D) colonoscopy provided more anatomical details than standard two-dimensional (2D) colonoscopy and improved ADR. We compared ADRs between 2D and 3D colonoscopy. In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, participants aged ≥40 years undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or symptoms between February 2022 and June 2023 were randomized 1:1 into 2D or 3D groups. The primary outcome was ADR. Secondary outcomes included detection rates for flat adenomas, right-sided adenomas, proximal adenomas, advanced adenomas, and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). Of 348 participants recruited, data from 158 (2D group) and 160 (3D group) were analyzed. Mucosa inspection time was comparable between the 3D (9.8 [SD 2.6] minutes) and 2D (9.4 [SD 3.1] minutes) groups (P = 0.21). Compared with the 2D group, the 3D group had a significantly higher ADR (53.1% vs. 38.6%; difference 14.5% [95%CI 3.7 to 25.4]; P = 0.009), and higher detection rates for flat adenomas (35.0% vs. 21.5%; difference 13.5% [95%CI 3.7 to 23.3]; P = 0.008), right-sided adenomas (26.3% vs. 15.2%; difference 11.1% [95%CI 2.2 to 19.9]; P = 0.02), proximal adenomas (38.1% vs. 23.4%; difference 14.7% [95%CI 4.7 to 24.7]; P = 0.005), and adenomas sized 5–9 mm (45.0% vs. 31.0%; difference 14.0% [95%CI 3.4 to 24.5]; P = 0.01). There was no difference in detection rates for SSLs or advanced adenomas. 3D colonoscopy improved adenoma detection without significantly increasing the mucosa inspection time.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1055/a-2510-8759
DOI: 10.1055/a-2510-8759.pdf
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2510-8759; http://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-2510-8759.pdf
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.42218682
Database: BASE