Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Scar Cosmesis: Assessment, Perception, and Impact on Body Image and Quality of Life—A Systematic Review

Title: Scar Cosmesis: Assessment, Perception, and Impact on Body Image and Quality of Life—A Systematic Review
Authors: Sethukumar, Priya; Awad, Zaid; Catling, Finneas J. R.; Tolley, Neil S.
Source: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery ; volume 151, issue S1 ; ISSN 0194-5998 1097-6817
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2014
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Objectives: (1) Review current validated scar assessment tools and (2) describe the impact of scar cosmesis perception on body image and quality of life. Methods: Three independent reviewers performed comprehensive searches and identified 680 English language studies published between 1950 and 2014 (data sources: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science). Literature including case series, cross sectional studies, meta‐analyses, and reviews was then screened and selected according to strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: Scar assessment: Review included Vancouver Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Manchester Scar Scale, Wound Evaluation Scale, and Western Scar Index. Validated qualitative assessment tools were clinically more useful than their quantitative counterparts. Patient perception input increased validity. Subjective satisfaction rating had little correlation with objective assessment of scarring. Perceptions: The size of defect did not correlate with impact, however location and visibility did. Psychosocial distress correlated with subjective severity. The large impact on physical and psychosocial quality of life (ascertained by generic and symptom‐specific validated assessment tools, as well as qualitative studies with interpretive phenomenologic analysis) is not to be overlooked. Conclusions: Careful selection of scar assessment tools is vital to gauge severity and plan further treatment. No consensus exists on the single most appropriate tool. A validated assessment tool is important in the assessment of scarring. There is a tendency to underestimate and thereby worsen the impact of scarring on patients’ quality of life. Further studies are required, particularly in the context of thyroid surgery.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1177/0194599814541629a24
Availability: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599814541629a24; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0194599814541629a24
Rights: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Accession Number: edsbas.424E4203
Database: BASE