Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

COVID-19 vaccine waning and effectiveness and side-effects of boosters: a prospective community study from the ZOE COVID Study

Title: COVID-19 vaccine waning and effectiveness and side-effects of boosters: a prospective community study from the ZOE COVID Study
Authors: Menni C; May A; Polidori L; Louca P; Wolf J; Capdevila J; Hu C; Ourselin S; Steves CJ; Valdes AM; Spector TD
Contributors: C. Menni; A. May; L. Polidori; P. Louca; J. Wolf; J. Capdevila; C. Hu; S. Ourselin; C. Steve; A. Valde; T. Spector
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: The University of Milan: Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (AIR)
Subject Terms: Settore MEDS-24/A - Statistica medica
Description: Background: With the surge of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, countries have begun offering COVID-19 vaccine booster doses to high-risk groups and, more recently, to the adult population in general. However, uncertainty remains over how long primary vaccination series remain effective, the ideal timing for booster doses, and the safety of heterologous booster regimens. We aimed to investigate COVID-19 primary vaccine series effectiveness and its waning, and the safety and effectiveness of booster doses, in a UK community setting. Methods: We used SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates in individuals from a longitudinal, prospective, community-based study (ZOE COVID Study), in which data were self-reported through an app, to assess the effectiveness of three COVID-19 vaccines (ChAdOx1 nCov19 [Oxford-AstraZeneca], BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNtech], and mRNA1273 [Moderna]) against infection in the 8 months after completion of primary vaccination series. In individuals receiving boosters, we investigated vaccine effectiveness and reactogenicity, by assessing 16 self-reported systemic and localised side-effects. We used multivariate Poisson regression models adjusting for confounders to estimate vaccine effectiveness. Findings: We included 620 793 participants who received two vaccine doses (204 731 [33·0%] received BNT162b2, 405 239 [65·3%] received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and 10 823 [1·7%] received mRNA-1273) and subsequently had a SARS-CoV-2 test result between May 23 (chosen to exclude the period of alpha [B.1.1.7] variant dominance) and Nov 23, 2021. 62 172 (10·0%) vaccinated individuals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were compared with 40 345 unvaccinated controls (6726 [16·7%] of whom tested positive). Vaccine effectiveness waned after the second dose: at 5 months, BNT162b2 effectiveness was 82·1% (95% CI 81·3–82·9), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 effectiveness was 75·7% (74·9–76·4), and mRNA-1273 effectiveness was 84·3% (81·2–86·9). Vaccine effectiveness decreased more among individuals aged 55 years or older and among those with comorbidities. 135 ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/35405090; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000833382700043; volume:22; issue:7; firstpage:1002; lastpage:1010; numberofpages:9; journal:THE LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES; https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1101528
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00146-3
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1101528; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00146-3
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.42CCC7BC
Database: BASE