Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Difference in Rupture Risk Between Familial and Sporadic Intracranial Aneurysms: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

Title: Difference in Rupture Risk Between Familial and Sporadic Intracranial Aneurysms: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis
Authors: Zuurbier, Charlotte CM; Mensing, Liselore A; Wermer, Marieke JH; Juvela, Seppo; Lindgren, Antti E; Koivisto, Timo; Jääskeläinen, Juha E; Yamazaki, Tomosato; Molenberg, Rob; Dijk, J Marc C van; Uyttenboogaart, Maarten; Aalbers, Marlien; Morita, Akio; Tominari, Shinjiro; Arai, Hajime; Nozaki, Kazuhiko; Murayama, Yuichi; Ishibashi, Toshihiro; Takao, Hiroyuki; Rinkel, Gabriel JE
Contributors: School of Medicine / Clinical Medicine
Publisher Information: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: University of Eastern Finland: UEF Electronic Publications
Description: Background and Objectives We combined individual patient data (IPD) from prospective cohorts of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) to assess to what extent patients with familial UIA have a higher rupture risk than those with sporadic UIA. Methods For this IPD meta-analysis, we performed an Embase and PubMed search for studies published up to December 1, 2020. We included studies that (1) had a prospective study design; (2) included 50 or more patients with UIA; (3) studied the natural course of UIA and risk factors for aneurysm rupture including family history for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and UIA; and (4) had aneurysm rupture as an outcome. Cohorts with available IPD were included. All studies included patients with newly diagnosed UIA visiting one of the study centers. The primary outcome was aneurysmal rupture. Patients with polycystic kidney disease and moyamoya disease were excluded. We compared rupture rates of familial vs sporadic UIA using a Cox proportional hazard regression model adjusted for PHASES score and smoking. We performed 2 analyses: (1) only studies defining first-degree relatives as parents, children, and siblings and (2) all studies, including those in which first-degree relatives are defined as only parents and children, but not siblings. Results We pooled IPD from 8 cohorts with a low and moderate risk of bias. First-degree relatives were defined as parents, siblings, and children in 6 cohorts (29% Dutch, 55% Finnish, 15% Japanese), totaling 2,297 patients (17% familial, 399 patients) with 3,089 UIAs and 7,301 person-years follow-up. Rupture occurred in 10 familial cases (rupture rate: 0.89%/person-year; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–1.59) and 41 sporadic cases (0.66%/person-year; 95% CI 0.48–0.89); adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for familial cases 2.56 (95% CI 1.18–5.56). After adding the 2 cohorts excluding siblings as first-degree relatives, resulting in 9,511 patients, the adjusted HR was 1.44 (95% CI 0.86–2.40). Discussion The risk of rupture of UIA is ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: e2195-e2203
Language: English
ISSN: 0028-3878
Relation: Neurology; http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012885; 22; 97; https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/29243
Availability: https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/29243
Rights: In copyright 1.0 ; openAccess ; © 2021 American Academy of Neurology ; https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.44C322BF
Database: BASE