Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Comparative Study of Instrumentation for Dorsolumbar Junction Spine Fractures

Title: Comparative Study of Instrumentation for Dorsolumbar Junction Spine Fractures
Authors: Suresh N Parmar; Parth P Modi; Vinay Rohra; Rajendra Kabaria
Publisher Information: International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Zenodo
Subject Terms: Dorsolumabar Junction; Fixation; Instrumentation; Dorsolumbar Spine
Description: Objectives: Comparison of Results of Various Types of Instrumentations in Fractures of the Dorsolumbar Junction and Determination of the Optimum Type of Instrumentation, Type of Decompression and Type of Reconstruction for Different Types of Fractures of the Dorsolumbar Junction. Material and Methods: This was a study of 60 patients with dorsolumabar junction fractures who were treated with open reduction and internal fixation at our institute. These patients were subjected to detailed neurological examination according to the proforma. The study was conducted between 32 patients (fixed with Harrington rod Group A) and 28 (pedicle screw rod Group B) with dorsolumbar spine fractures. Results: In our study, 60% fractures occur T11 to L2. Fall from tree were the common mode of injury in rural population, while in urban area, it was due to road accident followed by fall. Fractures of spine are more common in males as compared to females. Fixation with pedicle screw rod associated fast recovery and did not need any type of brace during postop rehabilitation, complication like implant failure, infection, etc. were less in pedicle screw group. Conclusion: Although, pedicle screw fixation is technically demanding procedure, requires image intensifier facilities and implant is more costly than Harrington instrumentation, but in benefit of patient, it is better than Harrington instrumentation, but in benefit of patient, it is far better than Harrington instrumentation. ; Objectives: Comparison of Results of Various Types of Instrumentations in Fractures of the Dorsolumbar Junction and Determination of the Optimum Type of Instrumentation, Type of Decompression and Type of Reconstruction for Different Types of Fractures of the Dorsolumbar Junction. Material and Methods: This was a study of 60 patients with dorsolumabar junction fractures who were treated with open reduction and internal fixation at our institute. These patients were subjected to detailed neurological examination according to the proforma. The study was ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
ISSN: 0975-1556
Relation: https://zenodo.org/records/13621492; oai:zenodo.org:13621492; https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/16/IJPCR,Vol16,Issue8,Article181.pdf; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13621492
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13621492
Availability: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13621492; https://zenodo.org/records/13621492; https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/16/IJPCR,Vol16,Issue8,Article181.pdf
Rights: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International ; cc-by-4.0 ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Accession Number: edsbas.48D43068
Database: BASE