Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Comparison of Voice Outcome After Vocal Fold Augmentation With Fat or Calcium Hydroxylapatite

Title: Comparison of Voice Outcome After Vocal Fold Augmentation With Fat or Calcium Hydroxylapatite
Authors: Lodder, Wouter L.; Dikkers, Frederik G.
Source: Lodder, W L & Dikkers, F G 2015, 'Comparison of Voice Outcome After Vocal Fold Augmentation With Fat or Calcium Hydroxylapatite', Laryngoscope, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 1161-1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25104
Publication Year: 2015
Collection: University of Groningen research database
Subject Terms: Glottal insufficiency; outcome; fat augmentation; calcium hydroxylapatite; voice handicap index; MEDIALIZATION LARYNGOPLASTY; INJECTION LARYNGOPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; THYROPLASTY; PARALYSIS; INSUFFICIENCY; SILICONE; IMPLANT
Description: Objectives/HypothesisTo evaluate the short-term voice outcomes of vocal fold augmentation using fat compared to calcium hydroxylapatite product Radiesse Voice (Merz Aesthetics). Study DesignRetrospective study design. MethodsSixty-six consecutive patients with vocal fold insufficiency were recruited, including the final 33 patients treated with fat and all 33 patients treated with calcium hydroxylapatite product. Before April 2011, fat augmentation was the standard treatment; from April 2011, only calcium hydroxylapatite product was used. For all subjects, videolaryngostroboscopic evaluation, s/z ratios, and voice handicap index (VHI) were analyzed. MethodsTreatment outcomes were evaluated 3 months after the augmentation. Two patients augmented with fat (both after 6 months), versus four augmented with calcium hydroxylapatite product (mean after 7 months), needed reintervention. Mean VHI decreased from 18 points in the fat augmentation group compared to 17 points in the calcium hydroxylapatite group. Mean s/z ratio changed -0.33 in the fat augmentation group compared to -0.46 in the calcium hydroxylapatite group. ConclusionThis retrospective cohort demonstrates that there are no short-term differences in VHI outcome or number of reinterventions for augmentation with fat compared to calcium hydroxylapatite product Radiesse Voice (Merz Aesthetics). Level of EvidenceLevel 4. Laryngoscope, 125:1161-1165, 2015
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
ISSN: 0023-852X
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/000353996900032; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/https://hdl.handle.net/11370/b1914842-5024-40d2-9847-6a5cc4a3927f; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/0023-852X
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25104
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/11370/b1914842-5024-40d2-9847-6a5cc4a3927f; https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/b1914842-5024-40d2-9847-6a5cc4a3927f; https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25104
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.49DF42E3
Database: BASE