Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Consensus on the clinical utility of digital mobility outcomes for personalized clinical decision support in parkinson's disease

Title: Consensus on the clinical utility of digital mobility outcomes for personalized clinical decision support in parkinson's disease
Authors: Mejia AC; Sapienza S; Paccoud I; Alcock L; Brown P; Gassner H; Hunter H; Maetzler W; Mirelman A; Nieuwboer A; Regensburger M; Rochester L; Stallforth S; Vereijken B; Yarnall A; Klucken J
Source: Neurological Research and Practice, December 2025
Publisher Information: BioMed Central Ltd
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Newcastle University Library ePrints Service
Description: © The Author(s) 2025. Background: Digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) have emerged as novel biomarkers offering objective, quantitative, and examiner-independent outcome measures for clinical studies. Unfortunately, research efforts on DMOs have not yet investigated the domain of clinical utility in Parkinson’s disease, i.e. providing evidence of improvements in health outcomes, diagnosis, decision-making, or prevention when compared to e.g. standard-of-care procedures. This manuscript, via a consensus building approach, aims to create a structured conceptual framework to map the knowledge generated by DMOs with clinical domains that could benefit from it. Methods: We conducted a three-round consensus-building study with 12 experts recruited from the Mobilise-D consortium’s Parkinson’s Disease Working Group. The experts designed and ranked different aspects of the conceptual framework via a 5-level Likert scale for level of agreement. Consensus for the different points evaluated was based on a double threshold: the simultaneous presence of a high level of agreement had to be accompanied by a low level of disagreement. As secondary objectives, the experts were asked to rate the practical application of DMOs by evaluating the timeline to applicability, the foreseen challenges for their implementation in clinical settings, and their main role in the decision-making process. Results: A full consensus on the clinical utility framework was achieved after three rounds. The final framework consisted of three main categories (Disease Diagnosis, Patient Evaluation, and Treatment Evaluation) and six underlying domains (Enhancing Diagnostic Procedure, Predicting Risk, Timely Detecting Deterioration, Enhancing Clinical Judgment, Selecting Treatment, and Monitoring Treatment Response). The experts believed in the next 1–5 years DMOs will play a relevant role in clinical decision making, complementing care knowledge with useful digital biomarkers information. However, the main challenge to address is the definition of clear ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: unknown
Relation: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/308049; https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/fulltext.aspx?url=308049/47876A0B-DDE3-45CE-A458-04709653E3A9.pdf&pub_id=308049
Availability: https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/308049
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.4A22688F
Database: BASE