Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Cochlear integrity and scalar translocation assessment after cochlear implantation based on three-dimensional anatomical reconstructions

Title: Cochlear integrity and scalar translocation assessment after cochlear implantation based on three-dimensional anatomical reconstructions
Authors: van Beurden, Imogen A M L; Hillebrink,Sanne F; Nguyen, H Chien; Postmus,Nikki M; Stokroos, Robert J; Thomeer, Hans G X M; Brain; MS KNO; DHS 3D Lab; Zorgeenheid KNO Medisch
Publication Year: 2026
Subject Terms: Cochlear implantation; Hearing preservation; Insertional trauma; Scalar translocation; Three-dimensional cochlear reconstructions; Otorhinolaryngology; Journal Article
Description: PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the cochlea can improve accuracy of assessment of electrode localisation and scalar translocation (STL) of the electrode array of cochlear implants (CIs). The predictive power for STL of the electrode-to-modiolus distance (EMD), the angle of insertion depth (aDOI) and cochlear anatomical dimensions remain unclear. METHODS: 3D cochlear reconstructions were developed in Materialise Mimics from cone beam CT (CBCT) scans of 28 human cadaveric temporal bones, of which histological assessment of STL was available. The EMD and aDOI were extracted in 3Matic. Cochlear diameter (A), width (B), and height (H) were extracted to calculate cochlear duct length (CDL) and cochlear volume (CV). RESULTS: Larger EMD values for EMD 1-16 might be associated with increased odds of STL (B = 0.10-1.10, OR = 1.11-3.57, p = 0.07-0.93). Mean cochlear diameter (A) and cochlear height (H) between STL and non-STL cases were comparable (A: STL: 10.23 mm vs. non-STL: 10.10 mm, p = 0.626 and H: STL: 4.50 mm vs. non-STL: 4.33 mm, p = 0.432). Larger cochlear width (B) might be associated with increased odds for STL (B = 1.56, OR = 4.64, p = 0.066). Cochlear width (B) showed significant discriminative ability for STL (AUC 0.72, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: 3D cochlear reconstructions may support the CI surgeon in assessment of electrode array placement. No compelling risk factors for STL were identified. Further investigation in a large clinical cohort is advocated.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: text/plain
Language: English
ISSN: 0937-4477
Relation: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/483697
Availability: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/483697
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.50A7DA15
Database: BASE