Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Beyond omission: analysing the erasure of disability and inclusion in the developmentally appropriate practices

Title: Beyond omission: analysing the erasure of disability and inclusion in the developmentally appropriate practices
Authors: Newton, Jennifer Ryan; Batz, Ruby; O’Grady, Courtney; Vinh, Megan; Blanchard, Sheresa Boone
Source: International Journal of Early Years Education, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)
Publisher Information: Taylor & Francis
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Carolina Digital Repository (UNC - University of North Carolina)
Subject Terms: attempt; child differences; disability; tools; inequality; young children; approach; Programme tool; injustice; NAEYC; developmental approach; National Association for the Education of Young Children; decades; children; adults; erasure; characteristics; differences; editing; National; manuscript; structure; educational structure; omission; disabled children; promote inequality; programme; teachers; practice; guidelines
Description: The 4th edition of the National Association for the Education of Young Children’s (NAEYC) guidelines for developmentally appropriate practice (DAP) had an opportunity to provide the field an inclusive blueprint. While there was an attempt in this edition to respond to decades of critiques (e.g. Bloch [1992]. “Critical Perspectives on the Historical Relationship Between Child Development and Early Childhood Education Research.” In Reconceptualizing the Early Childhood Curriculum: Beginning the Dialogue, edited by S. Kessler, and E. B. Swadener, 3–20. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.; Cannella [1997]. Deconstructing Early Childhood Education: Social Justice and Revolution. New York, NY: Peter Lang.; Escayg [2019]. “Who’s got the Power?”: A Critical Examination of the Anti-Bias Curriculum.” International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy 13 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-019-0062-9.; Langford [2010]. “Critiquing Child-Centered Pedagogy to Bring Children and Early Childhood Educators Into the Center of a Democratic Pedagogy.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 11 (1): 113–127. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.1.113.; Pérez and Saavedra [2017]. “A Call for Onto-Epistemological Diversity in Early Childhood Education and Care: Centering Global South Conceptualizations of Childhood/s.” Review of Research in Education 41 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16688621.; Souto-Manning and Rabadi-Raol [2018]. “(Re)Centering Quality in Early Childhood Education: Toward Intersectional Justice for Minoritized Children.” Review of Research in Education 42 (1): 203–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X187595.), the new edition continues to centre dominant developmental approaches where adults hyperfocus on children’s differences or individual characteristics rather than on changing educational structures and practices that promote inequity (Ferri and Bacon [2011]. “Beyond Inclusion: Disability Studies in Early Childhood Teacher Education.”). The revised guidelines do not go far enough to ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: unknown
Relation: https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/rf55zp61j?file=thumbnail; https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/rf55zp61j
DOI: 10.17615/xj4g-1b62
Availability: https://doi.org/10.17615/xj4g-1b62; https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/rf55zp61j?file=thumbnail; https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/rf55zp61j
Rights: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.51AA1920
Database: BASE