Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

“Safety Sling” Against Pedicle Screw Loosening in Lumbar Spinal Fusion

Title: “Safety Sling” Against Pedicle Screw Loosening in Lumbar Spinal Fusion
Authors: Schuler, Anna; Widmer, Jonas; Wigger, Oliver; Cornaz, Frédéric; Rohner, Ramon; Fasser, Marie-Rosa; Farshad, Mazda
Source: Spine Open ; volume 2, issue 2 ; ISSN 3066-8905
Publisher Information: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Publication Year: 2026
Description: Background Context: Spinal fusion with pedicle screw fixation is widely used for stabilization, yet its long-term success is often limited by mechanical complications such as screw loosening and pull-out. Purpose: Pedicle screw loosening and pull-out are major complications of instrumented spinal fusions, biomechanically caused mainly by excessive flexion moments. A “safety sling” (a textile band looped around the spinous processes) could prevent excessive loading on pedicle screws during flexion. The goal of this study is to examine the biomechanical effectiveness of the safety sling concept on construct strength during simulated lumbar flexion in human spinal segments. Study Design: Biomechanical cadaveric study. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four human lumbar segments were biomechanically tested under simulated flexion loads using an established biomechanical setup. Four groups (n=6 each) were compared: (1) pedicle screw instrumentation alone, (2) instrumentation with a dorsally attached safety sling (consisting of a 10 mm textile band around the segmental spinal processes), (3) instrumentation with midline decompression, and (4) instrumentation with midline decompression plus safety sling. All specimens underwent increasing flexion loads until failure to assess the safety sling’s effect on construct resilience. Results: The safety sling demonstrated a significant improvement in flexion moment resilience: Median failure load increased by factor 2.06 with an intact midline (60.6 Nm (47.2; 85.2) with safety sling versus 29.4 Nm (21.4; 32.9) without, P =0.026) and by factor 2.60 in decompressed segments (75.7 Nm (53.4; 76.5) with safety sling versus 29.1 Nm (25.6; 43.1) without, P =0.026). Conclusion: The concept of a “safety sling” (looping a band around the segment’s spinal processes) is a highly effective supplementary measure for enhancing primary construct strength during spinal flexion in pedicle screw constructions. By reducing the load on the screw-bone interface, this approach represents a promising ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/bn9.0000000000000074
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1097/bn9.0000000000000074; https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/bn9.0000000000000074
Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.55EB74E7
Database: BASE