Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Deciphering Alzheimer's Disease Complexity: Integrative Analysis of CSF Proteomic and Lipidomic Data through Dimensionality Reduction

Title: Deciphering Alzheimer's Disease Complexity: Integrative Analysis of CSF Proteomic and Lipidomic Data through Dimensionality Reduction
Authors: García‐González, Pablo; Puerta, Raquel; Dehairs, Jonas; de Rojas, Itziar; Montrreal, Laura; Pytel, Vanesa Verónica; Marquié, Marta; Rosende‐Roca, Maitee; Emon, Asif; Smets, Bart; Orellana, Adelina; Tárraga, Lluís; Boada, Mercè; Swinnen, Johannes V; Fernández, Victoria; Socorro, Alfredo Cabrera; Ruiz, Agustin
Source: Alzheimer's & Dementia ; volume 20, issue S2 ; ISSN 1552-5260 1552-5279
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Background Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a complex disorder and much of its etiopathology is still unknown. Here, we applied dimensionality reduction methods to disentangle cyptic patterns in CSF proteomic and lipidomic data. Method We studied 1121 CSF samples using targeted lipidomics based on liquid chromatography (LC)‐MS/MS (mass spectrometry), generated by Lipometrix (Lueven, Belgium), and proteomic data generated by Somalogic (Boulder, Colorado) using the SOMAscan 7k Assay. We independently computed the principal components for the proteomic and lipidomic datasets using good quality lipids (N=388) and proteins (N=2469). CSF samples were obtained by lumbar punctures at ACE Alzheimer Center (Barcelona, Spain), including patients at different points of the dementia continuum (SCD, MCI and dementia). Principal components were calculated using the princomp() function in R. Result PC1 explained a substantial fraction of the variance in lipidomic (∼40%) and proteomic (∼60%) datasets and was highly correlated between both omics (R2=0.43; p=2.3·10 ‐138 , Figure 1). We explored the association profile of the PCs to AD risk factors (age, sex, APOE, PRS, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, BMI), endophenotypes (abeta, tau), disease progression and total protein in the CSF. PC1, as well as the individual lipid species, were strongly associated with abeta, tau and total CSF protein levels (Figure 2). Finally, we conducted a GWAS of the first 20 lipidomic and proteomic PCs. PC1 displayed a GWS signal at chr3q28 in both omics. This region has been previously linked with CSF tau levels and brain morphology. Subsequent lipidomic PCs were associated with variants in the FADS1/FADS2 locus, while other proteomic PCs were associated with variants in the APOE locus (Figure 3). Conclusion Our findings revealed a shared major contributor to the variance in CSF between lipidomic and proteomic data, which is related to the tau, abeta and total protein signature, and identified a QTL associated to both the lipidomic and ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/alz.088693
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088693
Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.58D55CC2
Database: BASE