| Title: |
Incidence and predictors of postoperative recall of propofol injection pain: a prospective observational cohort pilot study |
| Authors: |
Gabriel Bellouni; Matthieu Clanet; Karim Touihri; Amelie Delaporte; Nancy M. Boulos; Kyubin Kim; Tristan Grogan; Brenton Alexander; Sean Coeckelenbergh; Alexandre Joosten |
| Source: |
BJA Open, Vol 17, Iss , Pp 100537- (2026) |
| Publisher Information: |
Elsevier |
| Publication Year: |
2026 |
| Collection: |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
| Subject Terms: |
anaesthesia induction; injection pain; patient-reported outcomes; postoperative recall; risk factors; Anesthesiology; RD78.3-87.3 |
| Description: |
Background: Propofol injection pain is common during i.v. induction and is often accompanied by nociceptive behaviours. Whether this pain is subsequently remembered by patients remains poorly characterised. We aimed to estimate the incidence of postoperative day 1 (POD#1) recall of propofol injection pain and to explore unadjusted associations with patient-, procedure-, and technique-related factors in routine clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a pilot prospective observational cohort study of adults undergoing low- to intermediate-risk noncardiac surgery with i.v. propofol induction between March and August 2025 at a single tertiary centre. The primary outcome was patient-reported recall of propofol injection pain on POD#1, assessed via structured interview. Secondary outcomes included recalled pain intensity (0–10 numerical rating scale), comparison with i.v. catheter insertion, and associations with observed nociceptive reactions and injection technique (catheter site, gauge, lidocaine use). All regression analyses were univariate, exploratory, and unadjusted. Results: Among 1043 patients with POD#1 data, 102 patients (9.8%; 95% confidence interval, 8.1–11.8%) recalled propofol injection pain. Recall was more frequent in women in univariate analyses. Catheter site, gauge, and lidocaine use showed no unadjusted associations with recall. Nociceptive reactions were frequent but did not differentiate patients with and without recall. Among patients with recall, median pain intensity was 7/10 (interquartile range, 5–9), and 99% rated pain as equal to or worse than i.v. cannulation. Conclusions: Approximately 10% of patients recalled propofol injection pain on POD#1, typically as severe pain. Female sex showed an unadjusted association with recall, whereas injection technique and observed nociceptive reactions did not. |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| ISBN: |
978-2-7726-0962-9; 2-7726-0962-6 |
| Relation: |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609626000110; https://doaj.org/toc/2772-6096; https://doaj.org/article/b4c119bda3954d4eafbab845509a942b |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.bjao.2026.100537 |
| Availability: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjao.2026.100537; https://doaj.org/article/b4c119bda3954d4eafbab845509a942b |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.5BD9E0BF |
| Database: |
BASE |