Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Quantifying diets for small pelagic fish: effects of weight versus occurrence methods and sampling effort

Title: Quantifying diets for small pelagic fish: effects of weight versus occurrence methods and sampling effort
Authors: Mousing, Erik Askov; Planque, Benjamin; Arneberg, Per; Bjørdal, Vilde Regine; Keulder-Stenevik, Felicia; Liebig, Penny Lee; Mørk, Herdis Langøy; Skern-Mauritzen, Mette
Contributors: Hunsicker, Mary; Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries; Norwegian Research Council
Source: ICES Journal of Marine Science ; volume 80, issue 2, page 317-328 ; ISSN 1054-3139 1095-9289
Publisher Information: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Year: 2023
Description: In the Norwegian Sea, assessment of diet composition relies on annual cruise activity combined with visual identification and weight determination of prey from fish stomachs. This weight-based method is labour intensive, and suggestions to reduce cost include moving from the weight-based to the occurrence-based method and/or reducing sampling effort. Studies have suggested that the occurrence-based method may be more robust while providing similar results as the weight-based method. Here we re-analyse data from >14.000 stomachs for herring, mackerel, and blue whiting. We compare diet composition estimates and quantify the uncertainty using both methods. We also quantify the impact of reducing sampling effort (number of trawl stations and fish per station) on the diet uncertainties. Our results confirm that occurrence-based estimates are more precise than those based on weight. In addition, they are better at capturing year-to-year fluctuations. The occurrence-based method provides similar results to the weight-based method. Differences between methods arise primarily from disparities in the mean weight of prey in stomachs. Decreasing the number of stations sampled leads to increased uncertainty, while reducing the sampling effort from 10 to 5 fish per station has little impact on uncertainty estimates. These results provide quantified insights to guide future diet monitoring programmes.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsac240
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsac240; https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/80/2/317/49520561/fsac240.pdf
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.5D7020FB
Database: BASE