Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness

Title: Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness
Authors: Sznycer, D.; Lopez Seal, M.F.; Sell, A.; Lim, J.; Porat, R.; Shalvi, S.; Halperin, E.; Cosmides, L.; Tooby, J.
Source: Sznycer, D, Lopez Seal, M F, Sell, A, Lim, J, Porat, R, Shalvi, S, Halperin, E, Cosmides, L & Tooby, J 2017, 'Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 31, pp. 8420-8425. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703801114
Publication Year: 2017
Collection: Universiteit van Amsterdam: Digital Academic Repository (UvA DARE)
Description: Why do people support economic redistribution? Hypotheses include inequity aversion, a moral sense that inequality is intrinsically unfair, and cultural explanations such as exposure to and assimilation of culturally transmitted ideologies. However, humans have been interacting with worse-off and better-off individuals over evolutionary time, and our motivational systems may have been naturally selected to navigate the opportunities and challenges posed by such recurrent interactions. We hypothesize that modern redistribution is perceived as an ancestral scene involving three notional players: the needy other, the better-off other, and the actor herself. We explore how three motivational systems—compassion, self-interest, and envy—guide responses to the needy other and the better-off other, and how they pattern responses to redistribution. Data from the United States, the United Kingdom, India, and Israel support this model. Endorsement of redistribution is independently predicted by dispositional compassion, dispositional envy, and the expectation of personal gain from redistribution. By contrast, a taste for fairness, in the sense of (i) universality in the application of laws and standards, or (ii) low variance in group-level payoffs, fails to predict attitudes about redistribution.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf; application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Language: English
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703801114
Availability: https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/support-for-redistribution-is-shaped-by-compassion-envy-and-selfinterest-but-not-a-taste-for-fairness(cb79d79d-ce71-4e72-8e49-f6f858922cde).html; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703801114; https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/cb79d79d-ce71-4e72-8e49-f6f858922cde; https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/20950591/Support_for_Redistribution.pdf; https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/20950593/SFR_S1.pdf; https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/25500341/pnas.1703801114.sd01.xlsx
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.5D87A26B
Database: BASE