Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of early compared to late or no biologic treatment to manage Crohn's disease using real world data

Title: Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of early compared to late or no biologic treatment to manage Crohn's disease using real world data
Authors: Pillai, Nadia; Lupatsch, Judith E; Dusheiko, Mark; Schwenkglenks, Matthias; Maillard, Michel; Sutherland, C Simone; Pittet, Valérie E H
Source: Pillai, Nadia; Lupatsch, Judith E; Dusheiko, Mark; Schwenkglenks, Matthias; Maillard, Michel; Sutherland, C Simone; Pittet, Valérie E H (2020). Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of early compared to late or no biologic treatment to manage Crohn's disease using real world data. Journal of Crohn's & Colitis, 14(4):490-500.
Publisher Information: Oxford University Press
Publication Year: 2020
Collection: University of Zurich (UZH): ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive
Subject Terms: Medical Clinic; Epidemiology; Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI); 610 Medicine & health
Description: BACKGROUND AND AIMS We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of early (≤2 years after diagnosis) compared to late or no biologic initiation (starting biologics >2 years after diagnosis or no biologic use) for adults with Crohn's disease in Switzerland. METHODS We developed a Markov cohort model over the patient's lifetime from the health system and societal perspectives. Transition probabilities, quality of life, and costs were estimated using real world data. Propensity score matching was used to ensure comparability between patients in the early (intervention) and late/no (comparator) biologic initiation strategies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained is reported in Swiss francs (CHF). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS Total costs and QALYs were higher for the intervention (CHF384,607; 16.84 QALYs) compared to comparator (CHF340,800; 16.75 QALYs) strategy, resulting in high ICERs (health system: CHF887,450 per QALY; societal: CHF449,130 per QALY). Assuming a threshold of CHF100,000 per QALY, in probabilistic sensitivity analysis the intervention strategy had a 0.1 and 0.25 probability of being cost-effective from the health system and societal perspectives, respectively. In addition, ICERs improved when we assumed a 30% reduction in biologic prices (health system: CHF134,502 per QALY; societal: intervention dominant). CONCLUSIONS Early biologic use was not cost-effective considering a threshold of CHF100,000 per QALY compared to late/no biologic use. However, early identification of patients likely to need biologics and future drug price reductions through increased availability of biosimilars may improve the cost-effectiveness of an early treatment approach.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 1873-9946
Relation: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/177294/1/jjz169.pdf; info:pmid/31630164; urn:issn:1873-9946
Availability: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/177294/; https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/177294/1/jjz169.pdf
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.5FB83
Database: BASE