Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Comparison of Mechanical Performance between Circular Frames and Biplanar Distraction Devices for Knee Joint Distraction

Title: Comparison of Mechanical Performance between Circular Frames and Biplanar Distraction Devices for Knee Joint Distraction
Authors: Chowdury, JMY; Lineham, B; Pallett, M; Pandit, HG; Stewart, TD; Harwood, PJ
Publisher Information: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: White Rose Research Online (Universities of Leeds, Sheffield & York)
Description: Aim and objective: This study was designed to test and compare the mechanical performance of the biplanar ArthroSave KneeReviver and a circular frame construct with the intended use of providing a mechanically favourable environment for cartilage regeneration across a knee joint. Materials and methods: Three similar constructs of the two devices were applied to biomechanical testing sawbones, with the knee distracted by 8 mm. The constructs were vertically loaded to 800 N in an Instron testing machine at 20 mm/minute. Tests were conducted in neutral hip flexion and at 12° of hip flexion and extension, to mimic leg position in gait. Displacement measurements were taken from the Instron machine, and three-dimensional joint motion was recorded using an Optotrak Certus motion capture system. Results: Overall axial rigidity was similar between the two devices (circular frame, 81.6 N/mm ± 5.9; and KneeReviver, 79.5 N/mm ± 25.1 with hip neutral) and similar in different hip positions. At the point of joint contact, the overall rigidity of the circular frame increased significantly more than the KneeReviver (491 N/mm ± 27 and 93 N/mm ± 32, respectively, p
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: text
Language: English
ISSN: 1828-8928
Relation: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/179346/12/jp-journals-10080-1530.pdf; Chowdury, JMY, Lineham, B, Pallett, M et al. (3 more authors) (2021) Comparison of Mechanical Performance between Circular Frames and Biplanar Distraction Devices for Knee Joint Distraction. Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, 16 (2). pp. 71-77. ISSN: 1828-8928
Availability: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/179346/
Rights: cc_by_nc_sa_4
Accession Number: edsbas.6403DF1E
Database: BASE