Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Contested fields of equality, diversity and inclusion at work:an institutional work lens on power relations and actors’ strategies in Germany and Turkey

Title: Contested fields of equality, diversity and inclusion at work:an institutional work lens on power relations and actors’ strategies in Germany and Turkey
Authors: Kornau, Angela; Knappert, Lena; Tatli, Ahu; Sieben, Barbara
Source: Kornau, A, Knappert, L, Tatli, A & Sieben, B 2023, 'Contested fields of equality, diversity and inclusion at work : an institutional work lens on power relations and actors’ strategies in Germany and Turkey', International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2481-2515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2086014
Publication Year: 2023
Subject Terms: diversity; Equality; inclusion; institutional actors; institutional work; national context; power; /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/peace_justice_and_strong_institutions; name=SDG 16 - Peace; Justice and Strong Institutions; /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/reduced_inequalities; name=SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
Description: In this paper, we explore how institutional actors push or resist equality, diversity and inclusion in light of power relations in their respective country contexts. We conducted interviews with a range of institutional actors, including governmental organizations, employer representatives, unions, professional associations, and civil society organizations working on EDI issues in Germany and Turkey, two countries with very different socioeconomic and political settings. Our findings suggest that EDI fields are structured by country-specific power relations: they appear as competitively dispersed in Germany and politically polarized in Turkey, depending on the social position of the actors and the type of field fragmentation. These field characteristics, in turn, nurture different patterns of actors’ strategies such as framing and mobilizing aimed at maintaining or disrupting the institutionalized status quo of EDI. We propose that a critical, power-sensitive institutional work approach to EDI is a useful lens through which to examine extra-organizational country contexts in international HRM research and, in particular, context-sensitive studies of EDI. As a practical implication, EDI and HR managers will be sensitized to the relevance of building coalitions with external stakeholders if they are to advance EDI within their organizations.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
ISSN: 0958-5192
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/31613148-567f-494e-a126-ac4f24234fe7; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/0958-5192
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2022.2086014
Availability: https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/31613148-567f-494e-a126-ac4f24234fe7; https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2086014; https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/31613148-567f-494e-a126-ac4f24234fe7; https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85131720828; https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85131720828#tab=citedBy
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.660EE818
Database: BASE