| Title: |
Critical care nurses' responses to clinical scenarios involving cardiopulmonary resuscitation for deceased inpatients without a Do Not Resuscitate order:a cross-sectional study |
| Authors: |
Hui, Heidi Hoi Ying; Cordina, Joanne; Teus, Judeil Krlan; Maitland, Susan; Watts, Michael; Zanotti, Sahn; Sheppard-Law, Suzanne; Merrick, Eamon; Skowronski, George; Bowdler, Suzanne; Light, Edwina; Montgomery, Amy; Preisz, Anne; Sheahan, Linda; Stewart, Cameron; Kerridge, Ian; McErlean, Gemma |
| Source: |
Hui, H H Y, Cordina, J, Teus, J K, Maitland, S, Watts, M, Zanotti, S, Sheppard-Law, S, Merrick, E, Skowronski, G, Bowdler, S, Light, E, Montgomery, A, Preisz, A, Sheahan, L, Stewart, C, Kerridge, I & McErlean, G 2025, 'Critical care nurses' responses to clinical scenarios involving cardiopulmonary resuscitation for deceased inpatients without a Do Not Resuscitate order : a cross-sectional study', Australian Critical Care, vol. 38, no. 4, 101254, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101254 |
| Publication Year: |
2025 |
| Subject Terms: |
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Defensive practice; Do Not Resuscitate order; Duty of care; Ethical practice; Not For Resuscitation |
| Description: |
Background: Current Australian resuscitation training focusses on the practical application of cardiopulmonary resuscitation but lacks clarity on when it is inappropriate. Nurses are often first responders to inpatient emergencies and may take different approaches to cardiopulmonary resuscitation due to their views about its benefit. There is a lack of literature on how the absence of Do Not Resuscitate orders affect nurses’ decisions regarding resuscitation in hospital settings. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore nurse's views of initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation on inpatients with unequivocal signs of death without a Do Not Resuscitate order, using hypothetical scenarios. Methods: The cross-sectional survey recruited nurses across five Australian hospitals between October 2023 and April 2024. Participants were provided two hypothetical clinical scenarios (scenario 1: Mr D, an 84-year-old man; scenario 2: Mr G, a 35-year-old man). In both scenarios, the patients had unequivocal signs of death and absent Do Not Resuscitate orders. Respondents were asked to indicate their actions. Responses from participants working in the intensive care unit, emergency department, or critical care are reported here. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: Eighty participants working in the intensive care unit, emergency department, or critical care completed the survey. Most nurses indicated they would call a Code Blue and initiate full resuscitation in both scenarios (scenario 1: 51.3% [n = 41] vs scenario 2: 92.5% [n = 74]). Fear and a misunderstanding of the law was a recurring reason for initiating resuscitation in both scenarios. Ethical judgement and family's expectations were predominant reasons for initiating resuscitation for the younger patient (scenario 2). Conclusions: Most nurses working in the intensive care unit, emergency department, or critical care areas chose to call a Code Blue and initiate full resuscitation in both scenarios where patients showed unequivocal signs of ... |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| File Description: |
application/pdf |
| Language: |
English |
| Relation: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/40412255 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101254 |
| Availability: |
https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/cb16f89b-6fc1-40c2-a66c-58e5f75c61d0; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101254; https://research-management.mq.edu.au/ws/files/501803221/Publisher_version.pdf; https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005596649 |
| Rights: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.689BB57A |
| Database: |
BASE |