Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Patient perspective on pre-operative communication; a post-operative cross-sectional survey of patients with gastro-intestinal malignancy

Title: Patient perspective on pre-operative communication; a post-operative cross-sectional survey of patients with gastro-intestinal malignancy
Authors: Lawday, Sam D J; Smart, Neil; Blazeby, Jane; Metcalfe, Chris; McNair, Angus G K
Source: Lawday, S D J, Smart, N, Blazeby, J, Metcalfe, C & McNair, A G K 2026, 'Patient perspective on pre-operative communication; a post-operative cross-sectional survey of patients with gastro-intestinal malignancy', Surgery Open Science, vol. 31, pp. 33-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2026.03.001
Publication Year: 2026
Collection: University of Bristol: Bristol Reserach
Description: Aim : Undergoing major cancer surgery is an important decision for patients. This study assessed the effectiveness of decision-making following colorectal and oesophageal cancer surgery. Methods : Patients who had undergone colorectal and oesophageal cancer surgery in two UK centres over two years were identified. Validated patient reported outcomes (PROs) were collected by cross sectional survey including perceived confidence in decision-making and effectiveness of risk communication (COMRADE scale), decision regret (Decisional Conflict Score; DCS), and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-PAL15). Uni-variable linear regression was used to explore the relationship between PRO scores and clinical and sociodemographic variables. Results : Some 143/244 (58%) patients returned the questionnaire. Overall, decision regret was low (median 7.81, range 0–23.4), and perceived confidence in decision-making and effectiveness of risk communication was good (median 95 (75–100) and 85 (70–100) respectively). Higher education level was associated with reduced regret (−0.7; CI −1.2 to −0.1;p = 0.016) and a longer length of hospital stay was associated with higher regret (1;CI 0.2–1.9;p = 0.014). Conclusion : Patients perceived decision-making to be effective in this study, but those with adverse outcomes may benefit from further support.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/41884790; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/https://hdl.handle.net/1983/6c6b4951-ee9d-4a41-9814-eaecc99da8c6
DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2026.03.001
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/1983/6c6b4951-ee9d-4a41-9814-eaecc99da8c6; https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/6c6b4951-ee9d-4a41-9814-eaecc99da8c6; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2026.03.001
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.6AA2AEB
Database: BASE