| Title: |
Three year clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve guided coronary revascularization using a monorail pressure sensor microcatheter |
| Authors: |
Bhavnani, C D; Koh, K T; Oon, Y Y; Pang, I X; Tan, C T; Chen, L S; Shu, F E P; Ho, K H; Cham, Y L; Ling, H S; Said, A; Thien, L K; Chung, B K; Fong, A Y Y; Ong, T K |
| Source: |
European Heart Journal ; volume 43, issue Supplement_1 ; ISSN 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
| Publisher Information: |
Oxford University Press (OUP) |
| Publication Year: |
2022 |
| Description: |
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has a Class 1A recommendation for guiding coronary revascularization in stable coronary artery disease. Deferral of revascularization for coronary stenosis of FFR >0.80 has shown favorable long-term outcomes, yet the adoption in real-world practice is limited. To date, there is no study on FFR guided PCI in the Malaysian population. Objective (1) To explore the 3-year clinical outcome of FFR guided coronary revascularization. (2) To compare the clinical outcome of FFR guided deferral of coronary revascularization versus FFR guided revascularization. The primary outcome was a composite of all cause mortality, non fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemia driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) Results Thirty-five patients were lost to follow up leaving 78 patients (95 vessels) for final analysis. The mean age was 59.3 ± 9.4 years old. 69 (88.5%) patients were male, 24 (30.7%) had diabetes mellitus, 58 (74.3%) had dyslipidemia, 61 (78.2%) had hypertension and 45 (57.7%) were smokers. The mean LVEF was 56.7 ± 14.7%. FFR to the LAD artery was performed in 64 (82%) patients. Based on the FFR value of 0.80, 47 (60.2%) patients had FFR guided deferral of coronary revascularization and 31 (39.7%) patients had FFR guided revascularization. At 3 years, 11 (14.1%) patients met the primary outcome, mainly driven by all-cause mortality (11.5%). The primary outcome was met in 14.9% of FFR guided deferral versus 12.9% of FFR guided revascularization (p = 0.828). All-cause mortality was 12.7% in patients with FFR guided deferral compared to 9.7% in patients with FFR guided revascularization at 3 years (p = 0.712). Cox proportional hazards model did not demonstrate any independent predictors associated with the primary outcome or all cause mortality. Conclusion FFR guided deferral of revascularization was safe and had comparable long-term clinical outcomes to FFR guided PCI. To our knowledge, this is the ... |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| DOI: |
10.1093/eurheartj/ehab849.123 |
| Availability: |
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab849.123; https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-pdf/43/Supplement_1/ehab849.123/42377131/ehab849.123.pdf |
| Rights: |
https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.6D36079A |
| Database: |
BASE |