Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Numerical Simulation Study of Combustion Characteristics and Pollutant Emissions of a 350 MW Coal-Fired Boiler Under Low Load Conditions with Ammonia Co-Firing

Title: Numerical Simulation Study of Combustion Characteristics and Pollutant Emissions of a 350 MW Coal-Fired Boiler Under Low Load Conditions with Ammonia Co-Firing
Authors: Guang Zeng; Mobei Xu; Chuang Zhou; Zhongyuan Hu; Xinmin Wang; Hongpeng Liu; Yueqi Wu; Qing Wang
Source: Energies ; Volume 19 ; Issue 7 ; Pages: 1765
Publisher Information: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Publication Year: 2026
Collection: MDPI Open Access Publishing
Subject Terms: co-firing; ammonia; carbon-free fuel; injection location; staged combustion
Description: With the advancement of low-carbon transition and deep load-following operation of coal-fired units, ammonia–coal co-firing is a retrofit-ready option for source decarbonization, but its coupled impacts on combustion and emissions remain to be quantified. A 350 MW corner-tangential pulverized-coal boiler at a 30% rated load was investigated using a three-dimensional ANSYS Fluent CFD model. Thirteen cases were designed by combining five ammonia shares (0–40%) with three injection locations (B, C, D). The temperature and key species fields were analyzed to track the reaction-zone shifts, and the outlet CO2, SO2, NO, and NH3 were evaluated. Increasing ammonia reduced and contracted the high-temperature core, dispersed the flame, extended the ignition distance of the ammonia-laden primary jet, and shifted heat release downstream. CO2 and SO2 decreased with an ammonia substitution; at 40% co-firing, CO2 fell by about 43% and SO2 declined markedly. NO showed a nonlinear, location-dependent response: B and C injection may raise NO at low ratios, but reduce it at higher ratios under lower temperatures and stronger reduction, whereas D injection tends to maintain higher NO in the upper furnace. The findings guide coordinated selection of the co-firing ratio and injection location for low-load retrofits.
Document Type: text
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: I2: Energy and Combustion Science; https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en19071765
DOI: 10.3390/en19071765
Availability: https://doi.org/10.3390/en19071765
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.7147489E
Database: BASE