Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Transect walks and malaise traps differ in temperature sensitivity but reveal consistent drivers of pollinator richness ; Transektläufe und Malaisefallen unterscheiden sich in ihrer Temperaturempfindlichkeit, zeigen jedoch konsistente Treiber der Artenvielfalt von Bestäubern

Title: Transect walks and malaise traps differ in temperature sensitivity but reveal consistent drivers of pollinator richness ; Transektläufe und Malaisefallen unterscheiden sich in ihrer Temperaturempfindlichkeit, zeigen jedoch konsistente Treiber der Artenvielfalt von Bestäubern
Authors: Kerner, Janika M.; König, Sebastian; Maihoff, Fabienne; Bofinger, Lukas; Sauer, Nikki; Ssymank, Axel; Väth, Peter; Classen, Alice
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Würzburg University: Online Publication Service
Subject Terms: ddc:570
Description: 1. While transect walks have long been the preferred monitoring method for many flying insect taxa, malaise traps combined with DNA metabarcoding have gained growing prominence. However, it remains unclear whether both methods reveal comparable species richness and the same ecological drivers along environmental gradients. 2. We selected three groups of pollinators (wild bees, hoverflies and butterflies) and one group of herbivores (grasshoppers) as functionally important and conservation‐relevant model groups, comparing results of both methods along an elevational gradient in the German Alps. 3. Across the study region, both methods detected a similarly high species richness of pollinators with ~50% overlap of species pools, but transect walks revealed more species per site, especially in higher elevations and under low temperatures. Body size spectra differed between methods, with on average more large butterfly and more small bee species in transect walks. Nevertheless, temperature and flower richness were consistent drivers of pollinator richness, independent of the sampling method. Grasshopper richness from transect walks was considerably higher than from malaise traps. Both methods identified temperature and only malaise traps also identified management as drivers of grasshopper richness. 4. We conclude that malaise traps are principally suitable substitutes for the more time‐consuming pollinator transect walks. However, the effectiveness of these passive traps is more susceptible to changes in sampling temperature, and in some pollinator groups, body size classes are presented differently, which is important to consider during analyses. For grasshoppers, transect walks appear to be more suitable to assess species richness, as considerably more species can be monitored. ; Zusammenfassung 1. Lange galten Transektläufe als die bevorzugte standardisierte Erfassungsmethode für viele Insekten‐Taxa. Seit einigen Jahren gewinnen jedoch Malaisefallen in Kombination mit DNA‐Metabarcoding zunehmend an ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12743
DOI: 10.1111/icad.12743
Availability: https://opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/38532; https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-385322; https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12743; https://opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/files/38532/ICAD_ICAD12743.pdf
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.722143FB
Database: BASE