Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

A randomized study of genetic education versus usual care in tumor profiling for advanced cancer in the ECOG‐ACRIN Cancer Research Group (EAQ152)

Title: A randomized study of genetic education versus usual care in tumor profiling for advanced cancer in the ECOG‐ACRIN Cancer Research Group (EAQ152)
Authors: Bradbury, Angela R.; Lee, Ju‐Whei; Gaieski, Jill Bennett; Li, Shuli; Gareen, Ilana F.; Flaherty, Keith T.; Herman, Benjamin A.; Domchek, Susan M.; DeMichele, Angela M.; Maxwell, Kara N.; Onitilo, Adedayo A.; Virani, Shamsuddin; Park, SuJung; Faller, Bryan A.; Grant, Stefan C.; Ramaekers, Ryan C.; Behrens, Robert J.; Nambudiri, Gopakumar S.; Carlos, Ruth C.; Wagner, Lynne I.
Contributors: National Institutes of Health
Source: Cancer ; volume 128, issue 7, page 1381-1391 ; ISSN 0008-543X 1097-0142
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Background Enthusiasm for precision oncology may obscure the psychosocial and ethical considerations associated with the implementation of tumor genetic sequencing. Methods Patients with advanced cancer undergoing tumor‐only genetic sequencing in the National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) trial were randomized to a web‐based genetic education intervention or usual care. The primary outcomes were knowledge, anxiety, depression, and cancer‐specific distress collected at baseline (T0), posteducation (T1) and after results (T2). Two‐sided, 2‐sample t tests and univariate and multivariable generalized linear models were used. Results Five hundred ninety‐four patients (80% from NCI Community Oncology Research Program sites) were randomized to the web intervention (n = 293) or usual care (n = 301) before the receipt of results. Patients in the intervention arm had greater increases in knowledge ( P for T1‐T0 < .0001; P for T2‐T0 = .003), but there were no significant differences in distress outcomes. In unadjusted moderator analyses, there was a decrease in cancer‐specific distress among women (T0‐T1) in the intervention arm but not among men. Patients with lower health literacy in the intervention arm had greater increases in cancer‐specific distress and less decline in general anxiety (T0‐T1) and greater increases in depression (T0‐T2) in comparison with those receiving usual care. Conclusions Web‐based genetic education before tumor‐only sequencing results increases patient understanding and reduces distress in women. Refinements to the intervention could benefit low‐literacy groups and men.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34063
Availability: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34063; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cncr.34063; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/cncr.34063
Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.72988085
Database: BASE