Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Determination of 'borderline resectable' pancreatic cancer : a global assessment of 30 shades of grey

Title: Determination of 'borderline resectable' pancreatic cancer : a global assessment of 30 shades of grey
Authors: Badgery, Henry E.; Muhlen-Schulte, Tjuntu; Zalcberg, John R.; D'souza, Bianka; Gerstenmaier, Jan F.; Pickett, Craig; Samra, Jaswinder; Croagh, Daniel; Ahmed, Farhan; Kleeff, Jörg H.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: Share it - Open Access und Forschungsdaten-Repositorium der Hochschulbibliotheken in Sachsen-Anhalt
Subject Terms: ddc:610; ddc:616
Description: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. Accurate preoperative assessment using computed tomography (CT) to determine resectability is crucial in ensuring patients are offered the most appropriate therapeutic strategy. Despite the use of classification guidelines, any interobserver variability between reviewing surgeons and radiologists may confound decisions influencing patient treatment pathways. In this multicentre observational study, an international group of 96 clinicians (42 hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons and 54 radiologists) were surveyed and asked to report 30 pancreatic CT scans of pancreatic cancer deemed borderline at respective multidisciplinary meetings (MDM). The degree of interobserver agreement in resectability among radiologists and surgeons was assessed and subgroup regression analysis was performed. Interobserver variability between reviewers was high with no unanimous agreement. Overall interobserver agreement was fair with a kappa value of 0.32 with a higher rate of agreement among radiologists over surgeons. Interobserver variability among radiologists and surgeons globally is high, calling into question the consistency of clinical decision making for patients with PDAC and suggesting that central review may be required for studies of neoadjuvant or adjuvant approaches in future as well as ongoing quality control initiatives, even amongst experts in the field.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISBN: 978-1-882993-80-2; 1-882993-80-2
Relation: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117579
DOI: 10.25673/117579
Availability: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119538; https://doi.org/10.25673/117579
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.740D2399
Database: BASE