Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

The significance of subdivisions of microscopically positive (R1) margins in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study of a national cancer registry

Title: The significance of subdivisions of microscopically positive (R1) margins in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study of a national cancer registry
Authors: Smith, Henry G.; Chiranth, Deepthi; Mortensen, Christiane E.; Schlesinger, Nis H.
Source: Colorectal Disease ; volume 24, issue 2, page 197-209 ; ISSN 1462-8910 1463-1318
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Aim Microscopically positive (R1) margins are associated with poorer outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. However, little is known of the differential impact of subdivisions of R1 margins, be they to the primary tumour (R1tumour) or to lymph node metastases/tumour deposits (R1LNM). Methods Patients treated for Stage III colorectal cancer from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019 were identified from the Danish national cancer registry. Patients were stratified into three groups according to margin status (R0 vs. R1tumour vs. R1LNM). The primary outcome was overall survival. Results In all, 4186 patients were included, comprising 3012 patients with colon cancer and 1174 patients with rectal cancer. The R1 resection rates were 16.5% and 18.2% in patients with colon and rectum cancer, respectively. In colon cancers, 3‐year overall survival was reduced in patients with R1LNM (65.7%, 95% CI 62.8–68.6) or R1tumour margins (51.8%, 95% CI 47.3–56.3) compared with R0 resections (80.8%, 95% CI 79.9–81.6, P < 0.001). A similar impact on survival was seen in rectal cancers (R0, 84.2%, 95% CI 82.9–85.5; R1LNM, 72.2%, 95% CI 67.8–76.6; R1tumour, 56.6%, 95% CI 50.0–63.2, P < 0.001). Margin status was independently prognostic of survival in both colon (R1tumour, hazard ratio 2.08, 95% CI 1.50–2.89, P < 0.001; R1LNM, hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.11–1.97, P = 0.008) and rectal cancers (R1tumour, hazard ratio 2.35, 95% CI 1.42–3.90, P < 0.001; R1LNM, hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 0.95–2.48, P = 0.077). Conclusion R1 subdivisions have distinct impacts on survival in Stage III colorectal cancer. Further focused research in these patient subgroups is warranted.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15971
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15971; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/codi.15971; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/codi.15971
Rights: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Accession Number: edsbas.740E00F
Database: BASE