Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ; The NAXOS Study

Title: Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ; The NAXOS Study
Authors: Van Ganse, Eric; Danchin, Nicolas; Mahé, Isabelle; Hanon, Olivier; Jacoud, Flore; Nolin, Maëva; Dalon, Faustine; Lefevre, Cinira; Cotté, François-Emery; Gollety, Sabrina; Falissard, Bruno; Belhassen, Manon; Steg, Ph. Gabriel
Source: Stroke ; volume 51, issue 7, page 2066-2075 ; ISSN 0039-2499 1524-4628
Publisher Information: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Publication Year: 2020
Description: Background and Purpose: The effects of direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation should be assessed in actual conditions of use. France has near-universal healthcare coverage with a unified healthcare information system, allowing large population-based analyses. NAXOS (Evaluation of Apixaban in Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation) aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and mortality of apixaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, in oral anticoagulant-naive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Methods: This was an observational study using French National Health System claims data and including all adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulant between 2014 and 2016. Outcomes of interest were major bleeding events leading to hospitalization (safety), stroke and systemic thromboembolic events (effectiveness), and all-cause mortality. Four approaches were used for comparative analyses: matching on propensity score (PS; 1:n); as a sensitivity analysis, matching on high-dimensional PS; adjustment on PS; and adjustment on known confounders. For each outcome, cumulative incidence rates accounting for competing risks of death were estimated. Results: Overall, 321 501 patients were analyzed, of whom 35.0%, 27.2%, 31.1%, and 6.6% initiated VKAs, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Apixaban was associated with a lower PS–matched risk of major bleeding compared with VKAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.40–0.46]) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63–0.72]), but not dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81–1.08]). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolic event compared with VKAs (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.56–0.65]), but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.97–1.15]) or dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.78–1.11]). All-cause mortality was lower with apixaban than with VKAs, but not lower than with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.120.028825
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028825
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.120.028825; https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028825
Accession Number: edsbas.76FE499A
Database: BASE