Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Title: Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
Authors: Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and West Midlands Research Collaborative; Curtis, N
Source: 426 ; 417
Publisher Information: Elsevier
Publication Year: 2019
Collection: Imperial College London: Spiral
Subject Terms: Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques; Adult; Aged; Collagen; Colon; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hernia; Humans; Ileus; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Surgical Mesh; Surgical Stomas; Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and West Midlands Research Collaborative; General & Internal Medicine; 11 Medical and Health Sciences
Subject Geographic: England
Description: BACKGROUND: Closure of an abdominal stoma, a common elective operation, is associated with frequent complications; one of the commonest and impactful is incisional hernia formation. We aimed to investigate whether biological mesh (collagen tissue matrix) can safely reduce the incidence of incisional hernias at the stoma closure site. METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial (ROCSS) done in 37 hospitals across three European countries (35 UK, one Denmark, one Netherlands), patients aged 18 years or older undergoing elective ileostomy or colostomy closure were randomly assigned using a computer-based algorithm in a 1:1 ratio to either biological mesh reinforcement or closure with sutures alone (control). Training in the novel technique was standardised across hospitals. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of clinically detectable hernia 2 years after randomisation (intention to treat). A sample size of 790 patients was required to identify a 40% reduction (25% to 15%), with 90% power (15% drop-out rate). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02238964. FINDINGS: Between Nov 28, 2012, and Nov 11, 2015, of 1286 screened patients, 790 were randomly assigned. 394 (50%) patients were randomly assigned to mesh closure and 396 (50%) to standard closure. In the mesh group, 373 (95%) of 394 patients successfully received mesh and in the control group, three patients received mesh. The clinically detectable hernia rate, the primary outcome, at 2 years was 12% (39 of 323) in the mesh group and 20% (64 of 327) in the control group (adjusted relative risk [RR] 0·62, 95% CI 0·43-0·90; p=0·012). In 455 patients for whom 1 year postoperative CT scans were available, there was a lower radiologically defined hernia rate in mesh versus control groups (20 [9%] of 229 vs 47 [21%] of 226, adjusted RR 0·42, 95% CI 0·26-0·69; p
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: The Lancet; http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/77225
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32637-6
Availability: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/77225; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32637-6
Rights: © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Accession Number: edsbas.77BFE0BC
Database: BASE