Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Should we embed randomized controlled trials within action research: arguing from a case study of telemonitoring

Title: Should we embed randomized controlled trials within action research: arguing from a case study of telemonitoring
Authors: Karen Day; Timothy W. Kenealy; Nicolette F. Sheridan
Source: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2016)
Publisher Information: BMC
Publication Year: 2016
Collection: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Subject Terms: Telehealth; RCT; Action research; Multiparadigm inquiry; Telemonitoring; Medicine (General); R5-920
Description: Background Action research (AR) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are usually considered to be theoretically and practically incompatible. However, we argue that their respective strengths and weaknesses can be complementary. We illustrate our argument from a recent study assessing the effect of telemonitoring on health-related quality of life, self-care, hospital use, costs and the experiences of patients, informal carers and health care professionals in two urban hospital services and one remote rural primary care service in New Zealand. Methods Data came from authors’ observations and field notes of discussions with three groups: the healthcare providers and healthcare consumers who participated in the research, and a group of 17 researchers and collaborators. The consumers had heart failure (Site A, urban), airways disease (Site B, urban), and diabetes (Site C, rural). The research ran from 2008 (project inception) until 2012 (project close-off). Researchers came from a wide range of disciplines. Both RCT and AR methods were recognised from early in the process but often worked in parallel rather than together. In retrospect, we have mapped our observed research processes to the AR cycle characteristics (creation of communicative space, democracy and participation, iterative learning and improvement, emergence, and accommodation of different ways of knowing). Results We describe the context, conduct and outcomes of the telemonitoring trial, framing the overall process in the language of AR. Although not fully articulated at the time, AR processes made the RCT sensitive to important context, e.g. clinical processes. They resulted in substantive changes to the design and conduct of the RCT, and to interpretation and uptake of findings, e.g. a simpler technology procurement process emerged. Creating a communicative space enabled co-design between the researcher group and collaborators from the provider participant group, and a stronger RCT design. Conclusions It appears possible to enhance the ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-016-0175-6; https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2288; https://doaj.org/article/3570a70c44db4f3dbdf77930f3c18a5b
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0175-6
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0175-6; https://doaj.org/article/3570a70c44db4f3dbdf77930f3c18a5b
Accession Number: edsbas.7C54829
Database: BASE