Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Diagnostic accuracy of covid-19 rapid antigen tests with unsupervised self-sampling in people with symptoms in the omicron period:cross sectional study

Title: Diagnostic accuracy of covid-19 rapid antigen tests with unsupervised self-sampling in people with symptoms in the omicron period:cross sectional study
Authors: Schuit, Ewoud; Venekamp, Roderick P.; Hooft, Lotty; Veldhuijzen,Irene K.; van den Bijllaardt,Wouter; Pas,Suzan D.; Zwart,Vivian F.; Lodder,Esther B.; Hellwich,Marloes; Koppelman,Marco; Molenkamp,Richard; Wijers,Constantijn J.H.; Vroom,Irene H.; Smeets,Leonard C.; Nagel-Imming,Carla R.S.; Han,Wanda G.H.; van den Hof,Susan; Kluytmans, Jan A.J.W.; van de Wijgert, Janneke H.H.M.; Moons, Karel G.M.; Epi Methoden Team 4; JC onderzoeksprogramma Methodology; HAG Onderzoek; Child Health; Infection & Immunity; JC onderzoeksprogramma Infectious Diseases; Epidemiology & Health Economics; Medische Microbiologie; Epi Infectieziekten Team 1b; Epi Methoden; Cancer
Publication Year: 2022
Subject Terms: COVID-19/diagnosis; COVID-19 Testing; Citric Acid; Copper Sulfate; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Prospective Studies; Sodium Bicarbonate; Specimen Handling; United States; General Medicine; Journal Article
Description: OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of rapid antigen tests with unsupervised nasal and combined oropharyngeal and nasal self-sampling during the omicron period. DESIGN: Prospective cross sectional diagnostic test accuracy study. SETTING: Three public health service covid-19 test sites in the Netherlands, 21 December 2021 to 10 February 2022. PARTICIPANTS: 6497 people with covid-19 symptoms aged ≥16 years presenting for testing. INTERVENTIONS: Participants had a swab sample taken for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR, reference test) and received one rapid antigen test to perform unsupervised using either nasal self-sampling (during the emergence of omicron, and when omicron accounted for >90% of infections, phase 1) or with combined oropharyngeal and nasal self-sampling in a subsequent (phase 2; when omicron accounted for >99% of infections). The evaluated tests were Flowflex (Acon Laboratories; phase 1 only), MPBio (MP Biomedicals), and Clinitest (Siemens-Healthineers). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of each self-test, with RT-PCR testing as the reference standard. RESULTS: During phase 1, 45.0% (n=279) of participants in the Flowflex group, 29.1% (n=239) in the MPBio group, and 35.4% ((n=257) in the Clinitest group were confirmatory testers (previously tested positive by a self-test at own initiative). Overall sensitivities with nasal self-sampling were 79.0% (95% confidence interval 74.7% to 82.8%) for Flowflex, 69.9% (65.1% to 74.4%) for MPBio, and 70.2% (65.6% to 74.5%) for Clinitest. Sensitivities were substantially higher in confirmatory testers (93.6%, 83.6%, and 85.7%, respectively) than in those who tested for other reasons (52.4%, 51.5%, and 49.5%, respectively). Sensitivities decreased from 87.0% to 80.9% (P=0.16 by χ2 test), 80.0% to 73.0% (P=0.60), and 83.1% to 70.3% (P=0.03), respectively, when transitioning from omicron accounting for 29% of infections to >95% of infections. During ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: text/plain
Language: English
ISSN: 1756-1833
Relation: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/447134
Availability: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/447134
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.7C9C0FF6
Database: BASE