Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Hybrid Machine Learning Models for Soil Saturated Conductivity Prediction

Title: Hybrid Machine Learning Models for Soil Saturated Conductivity Prediction
Authors: Francesco Granata; Fabio Di Nunno; Giuseppe Modoni
Contributors: Granata, Francesco; DI NUNNO, Fabio; Modoni, Giuseppe
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: IRIS Unicas (Università degli Studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale)
Description: The hydraulic conductivity of saturated soil is a crucial parameter in the study of any engineering problem concerning groundwater. Hydraulic conductivity mainly depends on particle size distribution, soil compaction, and properties that influence aggregation and water retention. Generally, finding simple and accurate analytical equations between the hydraulic conductivity of soil and the characteristics on which it depends is a very hard task. Machine learning algorithms can provide excellent tools for tackling highly nonlinear regression problems. Additionally, hybrid models resulting from the combination of multiple machine learning algorithms can further improve the accuracy of predictions. Five different models were built to predict saturated hydraulic conductivity using a dataset extracted from the Soil Water Infiltration Global database. The models were based on different predictors. Seven variants of each model were compared, replacing the implemented algorithm. Three variants were based on individual models, while four variants were based on hybrid models. The employed individual machine learning algorithms were Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, and Support Vector Regression. The model based on the largest number of predictors led to the most accurate predictions. In addition, across all models, hybrid variants based on all three algorithms and hybridized variants of Random Forest and Support Vector Regression proved to be the most accurate (R2 values up to 0.829). However, all variants showed a tendency to overestimate conductivity in soils where it is very low.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: ELETTRONICO
Language: English
Relation: volume:14; issue:11; journal:WATER; https://hdl.handle.net/11580/91658
DOI: 10.3390/w14111729
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/11580/91658; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14111729; https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/11/1729
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.7D20622F
Database: BASE