Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Getting the basics right: the monitoring of arteriovenous fistulae, a review of the evidence

Title: Getting the basics right: the monitoring of arteriovenous fistulae, a review of the evidence
Authors: Bodington, Richard; Greenley, Sarah; Bhandari, Sunil
Source: Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension ; volume 29, issue 6, page 564-571 ; ISSN 1062-4821 1473-6543
Publisher Information: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Publication Year: 2020
Description: Purpose of review Despite being the preferred vascular access for haemodialysis, the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) remains prone to a number of complications, the most common of these being thrombosis secondary to stenosis. This has resulted in the widespread use of monitoring and surveillance programmes. Surveillance uses more resources than monitoring and has not been convincingly shown to improve outcomes. The evidence supporting the use of the various monitoring tools has been relatively neglected and has not been the focus of literature review. This narrative review is the first to appraise the evidence for the use of physical examination, access recirculation, Kt / V and dynamic venous pressures (DVP) as monitoring tools in mature AVF. Recent findings The vastly increased number of data points for access recirculation, Kt / V and DVP produced as standard by online clearance monitoring (OCM) on modern dialysis machines is likely to have significantly changed the utility of these metrics in the prediction of AVF failure. Algorithms have been developed to highlight those of highest risk of failure. Summary The evidence supporting the use of monitoring in the prediction of AVF failure is predominantly observational, underpowered and more than 20 years old. Access recirculation and Kt / V appears to have higher utility in AVF than in arteriovenous grafts. We suggest that the development of OCM necessitates the reevaluation of these tools.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000644
DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000644
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1097/mnh.0000000000000644; https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/MNH.0000000000000644
Accession Number: edsbas.7DA8B12E
Database: BASE