Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Three frameworks for AI mentality.

Title: Three frameworks for AI mentality.
Authors: Shevlin, Henry
Publisher Information: Frontiers; //doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1715835
Publication Year: 2026
Collection: Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Subject Terms: anthropomorphism; folk psychology; human-AI relationships; large language models; philosophy of AI; social AI; theories
Description: Peer reviewed: True ; Publication status: Published ; Rapid advances in large language models (LLMs) have been accompanied by a striking increase in public and user attribution of mentality to AI systems. This paper offers a structured analysis of these attributions by distinguishing three frameworks for thinking about AI mentality and their implications for interpretation. First, I examine "mindless machines" views, focusing on architectural debunking arguments that claim mechanistic or algorithmic descriptions render folk-psychological explanation redundant. Drawing on Marr's levels of analysis, I argue that such arguments are often too quick, though they highlight an important distinction between "deep" folk-psychological concepts that are sensitive to implementation and "shallow" concepts such as belief and desire that are more architecture-indifferent. Second, I assess "mere roleplay" views that treat mental-state ascriptions to LLMs as useful heuristics akin to engagement with fiction. I argue that this stance is psychologically unstable in anthropomimetic systems designed to elicit unironic anthropomorphism, and theoretically incomplete insofar as roleplay analogies typically presuppose an underlying agent. Third, I develop a "minimal cognitive agents" framework under which LLMs may warrant limited, graded attributions of belief- and desire-like states. I suggest that moving from binary to multidimensional, continuous conceptions of belief can preserve distinctions between humans, LLMs, and simpler systems while better capturing emerging interpretive practice and its normative stakes.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf; text/xml
Language: English
Relation: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/398656
Availability: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/398656
Accession Number: edsbas.8304DE35
Database: BASE