Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Differential diagnosis of Lewy body dementias using multivariate EEG classifiers

Title: Differential diagnosis of Lewy body dementias using multivariate EEG classifiers
Authors: Yoder, Keith J; Brookshire, Geoffrey; Gerrol, Spencer; Quirk, Colin; Lucero, Ché
Source: Alzheimer's & Dementia ; volume 19, issue S16 ; ISSN 1552-5260 1552-5279
Publisher Information: Wiley
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
Description: Background Lewy body dementia (LBD) results from pathology in ɑ‐synuclein and is the second most common cause of dementia. LBD has two manifestations: Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). There is currently no non‐invasive, fast, reliable way to distinguish between early‐stage PDD, DLB, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Although previous traditional EEG visual rating methods have not been useful in delineating dementia subtypes, resting‐state electroencephalography (rsEEG) is a promising method for differential diagnosis of dementia, because it is inexpensive, non‐invasive, and widely available for clinical use. Here, we demonstrate how a multivariate classifier using rsEEG as input can differentiate PDD, DLB, and Alzheimer’s disease. Method We analyzed rsEEG data from older adults (N = 133, age 59‐89) with AD (n = 33), DLB (n = 27) or PDD (n = 45). We computed the aperiodic and periodic parameterization of brain activity, along with metrics of variation in fractal dimension within specific frequency bands. We then used these features, along with age and sex, to develop XGBoost machine‐learning models to predict patient diagnoses. Models were evaluated using cross‐validation with balanced accuracy, weighted sensitivity, and weighted specificity. Result The first task was a two‐way classification: Control vs Dementia (accuracy = 86%, sensitivity = 93%, specificity = 79%, p < .001). The second task was a three‐way classification: AD vs DLB vs PDD (accuracy = 66%, sensitivity = 70%, specificity = 82%, p < .001). We also evaluated two‐way models distinguishing between AD vs DLB (accuracy = 86%, sensitivity = 87%, specificity = 86%, p < .001), AD vs PDD (accuracy = 84%, sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 83%, p < .001), AD vs LBD (combined DLB and PDD; accuracy = 82%, sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 78%, p < .01), and DLB vs PDD (accuracy = 68%, sensitivity = 71%, specificity = 65%, p < .05). Conclusion Machine‐learning and rsEEG are capable of distinguishing ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/alz.080264
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.080264
Rights: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Accession Number: edsbas.8394559D
Database: BASE