Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Coproduction and health: Public and clinicians' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators

Title: Coproduction and health: Public and clinicians' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators
Authors: Holland-Hart, Daniella M.; Addis, Samia M.; Edwards, Adrian; Kenkre, Joyce E.; Wood, Fiona
Publisher Information: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Publication Year: 2019
Collection: Cardiff University: ORCA (Online Research @ Cardiff)
Description: Background Coproduction is an approach increasingly recognized across public services internationally. However, awareness of the term and the barriers and facilitators to its implementation in the NHS are not widely understood. This study examines clinician and public perceptions of coproduction within the context of the Prudent Healthcare initiative. Objectives To provide insights into how coproduction is viewed by clinicians and the public and identify perceived barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Design Using qualitative research methods, interviews were conducted with the public (n = 40) and clinicians (n = 40). Five focus groups were also conducted with the public (n = 45) and six focus groups with clinicians (n = 26). The COM‐B model was used to analyse the data; key domains include Capability, Opportunity and Motivation. Setting This is an all‐Wales study, involving six Health Boards, an NHS trust and community and patient groups. Results Key barriers relating to Capability include lack of awareness of the term coproduction and inadequate communication between clinicians and citizens. Opportunity‐centred barriers include service and time constraints. Conversely, facilitators included utilizing partnerships with community organizations. Motivation‐related barriers included preconceptions about patients’ limitations to coproduce. Conclusions There were broadly positive perceptions among participants regarding coproduction, despite initial unfamiliarity with the term. Despite study limitations including underrepresentation of employed public participants and junior doctors, our analysis may assist researchers and policymakers who are designing, implementing and evaluating interventions to promote coproduction.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/116069/1/Holland-Hart_et_al-2018-Health_Expectations.pdf; Holland-Hart, Daniella M. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/view/cardiffauthors/A2228773U.html orcid:0000-0002-1127-5152 orcid:0000-0002-1127-5152, Addis, Samia M. orcid:0000-0001-9050-5317 orcid:0000-0001-9050-5317, Edwards, Adrian https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/view/cardiffauthors/A029488L.html orcid:0000-0002-6228-4446 orcid:0000-0002-6228-4446, Kenkre, Joyce E. and Wood, Fiona https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/view/cardiffauthors/A016194K.html orcid:0000-0001-7397-4074 orcid:0000-0001-7397-4074 2019. Coproduction and health: Public and clinicians' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators. Health Expectations 22 (1) , pp. 93-101. 10.1111/hex.12834 https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12834 file https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/116069/1/Holland-Hart_et_al-2018-Health_Expectations.pdf
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12834
Availability: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/116069/; https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12834
Rights: cc_by_nc
Accession Number: edsbas.83E1A764
Database: BASE