| Description: |
Since 2023, the multiple-mini-interview-based selection procedure Interactional Competencies Medicine (IC-MD) has been used in the Additional Aptitude Quota 1 (ZEQ-1) in Heidelberg. The IC-MD enables the identification of applicants who get access to medical studies through outstanding interactional skills. These skills are important for both studying as well as practicing as a doctor, as they are among the most relevant characteristics of what makes a good medical doctor. The IC-MD assesses these skills based on the concept of emotional availability and is evaluated by trained raters using a detailed manual. Data from a pilot study from 2019-2021 has now been used to analyze the stability of the measured interactional competencies (r=0.40) with follow-up assessments based on the IC-MD manual as part of the OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation) examinations. Results show that interactional competencies are relatively stable over time: Students who demonstrate excellent interactional competencies at the beginning of their studies maintain those throughout their studies. ; In Heidelberg wird seit dem Jahr 2023 in der Zusätzlichen Eignungsquote (ZEQ-1) das Multiple-Mini-Interview basierte Verfahren Interaktionelle Kompetenzen Medizin (IKM) eingesetzt. Hier ermöglicht der Einsatz des IKM, Bewerbende zu identifizieren, die einen Zugang zum Studium durch besondere interaktionelle Kompetenzen erhalten. Diese Kompetenzen sind sowohl für das Studium als auch den Beruf angehender Mediziner*innen von Bedeutung, denn sie zählen zu den relevantesten Eigenschaften guter Ärzt:innen. Das IKM erfasst diese Fähigkeiten basierend auf dem Konzept der emotionalen Verfügbarkeit und wird von geschulten Rater:innen anhand eines detaillierten Manuals bewertet. Durch Daten einer Pilotierungsstudie von 2019-2021 wird nun mit erneuten Bewertungen anhand des IKM-Manuals im Rahmen der OSCE-Prüfungen die Stabilität der gemessenen interaktionellen Kompetenzen analysiert (r=0.40) welche zeigt, dass interaktionelle Kompetenzen über die ... |
| Relation: |
Fleck L, Amelung D, Fuchs A, Mayer B, Escher M, Listunova L, Schultz JH, Möltner A, Schütte C, Wittenberg T, Schneider I, Herpertz SC. Interactional competencies in medical student admission–what makes a “good medical doctor”? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025;30(2):439-458. DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10348-w; Biringen Z. Emotional availability: Conceptualization and research findings. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2000;70(1):104-114. DOI:10.1037/h0087711; Filliettaz L, Garcia S, Zogmal M. Video-based interaction analysis: A research and training method to understand workplace learning and professional development. In: Goller M, Kyndt E, Paloniemi S, Damşa C, editors. Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications and empirical illustrations. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p.419-440. DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_19; Young RF, Miller ER. Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. Mod Lang J. 2004;88(4):519-535. DOI:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-16-.x; Borracci RA, Álvarez Gallesio JM, Ciambrone G, Matayoshi C, Rossi F, Cabrera S. What patients consider to be a ‘good’ doctor, and what doctors consider to be a ‘good’ patient: a text-mining algorithm-based analysis. Rev Med Chile. 2020;148(7):930-938. DOI:10.4067/S0034-98872020000700930; Steiner-Hofbauer V, Schrank B, Holzinger A. What is a good doctor? Wien Med Wochenschr. 2018;168(15):398-405. DOI:10.1007/s10354-017-0597-8; Birkhäuer J, Gaab J, Kossowsky J, Hasler S, Krummenacher P, Werner C, Gerger H. Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170988. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170988; Clever SL, Jin L, Levinson W, Meltzer DO. Does doctor–patient communication affect patient satisfaction with hospital care? Results of an analysis with a novel instrumental variable. Health Serv Res. 2008;43(5 Pt 1):1505-1519. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00849.x; Zolnierek KB, DiMatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826-834. DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819a5acc; Pau A, Jeevaratnam K, Chen YS, Fall AA, Khoo C, Nadarajah VD. The multiple mini-interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training–a systematic review. Med Teach. 2013;35(12):1027-1041. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2013.829912; Leinweber J, Creedy DK, Rowe H, Gamble J. Assessing emotional aspects of midwives’ intrapartum care: Development of the emotional availability and responsiveness in intrapartum care scale. Midwifery. 2019;74:84-90. DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2019.03.019; Söderberg AK, Elfors C, Larsson MH, Falkenström F, Holmqvist R. Emotional availability in psychotherapy: The usefulness and validity of the emotional availability scales for analyzing the psychotherapeutic relationship. Psychother Res. 2014;24(1):91-102. DOI:10.1080/10503307.2013.826833; https://series.publisso.de/en/journals/jme/volume42/zma001768; https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001768; https://series.publisso.de/en/publisso_gold/export/pdf/article/5251/zma001768.pdf |