Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Predicting health-related quality of life two years post-diagnosis across seven cancer types:using machine learning to identify vulnerable patients

Title: Predicting health-related quality of life two years post-diagnosis across seven cancer types:using machine learning to identify vulnerable patients
Authors: Oudijk,Willemijn F; de Rooij,Belle H; van Benthem,Koen J; Etienne,Rampal S; Oerlemans, Simone; Verkooijen, Helena M; Aben,Katja K H; Vink, Geraldine R; May, Anne M; Mols,Floortje; Katsimpokis,Dimitris; Ezendam,Nicole P M; PROVE; Cancer; Onderzoek Medische Oncologie; Epi Kanker; JC onderzoeksprogramma Cancer
Publication Year: 2026
Subject Terms: Adult; Aged; Cancer Survivors/psychology; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Longitudinal Studies; Machine Learning; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms/psychology; Netherlands; Quality of Life/psychology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Journal Article
Description: PURPOSE: Cancer survivors often experience long-term consequences affecting their Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). Sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and health-related behaviours influence HRQoL, making some individuals vulnerable to adverse HRQoL. This study develops linear regression and machine learning models to predict HRQoL two-year post-diagnosis and to identify key vulnerability factors. METHODS: This longitudinal study included data of survivors of seven cancer types. Nineteen predictor variables were derived from questionnaires completed within three months post-diagnosis (baseline) from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Linear regression, random forest, XGBoost, neural network, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) regressors were employed to predict the EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score 1.5-2.5 years post-diagnosis. Permutation testing assessed vulnerability factors. RESULTS: The analyses included 4,538 individuals. All models achieved similar R 2 (0.3) and RMSE (9) scores. Linear regression, random forest, XGBoost, and SVM models identified lower physical, cognitive, and emotional functioning at diagnosis, along with more comorbidities, cancer type (especially endometrial), and higher BMI as the top vulnerability factors. Treatment, age, and education were not associated with vulnerability. All models tended to overestimate low HRQoL which might be due to the limited number of observations with low HRQoL values. CONCLUSIONS: The predictors used in this analysis explained only 30% of the variation in long-term HRQoL. Similar to previous studies predicting HRQoL in cancer, these predictors miss crucial information. Baseline functioning, comorbidities, cancer type and BMI appeared to be the key vulnerability factors. Future studies should prioritize accurate prediction of low HRQoL scores.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 0962-9343
Relation: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/469429
Availability: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/469429
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.87E2A4B2
Database: BASE