Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

The role of unidentified bright objects in the neurocognitive profile of neurofibromatosis type 1 children: a volumetric MRI analysis

Title: The role of unidentified bright objects in the neurocognitive profile of neurofibromatosis type 1 children: a volumetric MRI analysis
Authors: Di Stasi M.; Cocozza S.; Buccino S.; Paolella C.; Di Napoli L.; D'Amico A.; Melis D.; Ugga L.; Villano G.; Ruocco M.; Scala I.; Brunetti A.; Elefante A.
Contributors: Di Stasi, M.; Cocozza, S.; Buccino, S.; Paolella, C.; Di Napoli, L.; D'Amico, A.; Melis, D.; Ugga, L.; Villano, G.; Ruocco, M.; Scala, I.; Brunetti, A.; Elefante, A.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: IRIS Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Subject Terms: Cognitive impairment; MRI; Neurofibromatosis type1; UBOs
Description: Purpose: Cognitive impairment is described in 80% of Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients. Brain focal areas of T2w increased signal intensity on MRI, the so-called Unidentified Bright Objects (UBOs) have been hypothesized to be related to cognitive dysfunction, although conflicting results are available in literature. Here, we investigated the possible relation between UBOs’ volume, cognitive impairment, and language disability in NF1 patients. Material and methods: In this retrospective study, clinical and MRI data of 21 NF1 patients (M/F = 12/9; mean age 10.1 ± 4.5) were evaluated. Brain intellectual functioning and language abilities were assessed with specific scales, while the analyzed MRI sequences included axial 2D-T2-weighted and FLAIR sequences. These images were used independently for UBOs segmentation with a semiautomatic approach and obtained volumes were normalized for biparietal diameters to take into account for brain volume. Possible differences in terms of normalized UBOs volumes were probed between cognitively affected and preserved patients, as well as between subjects with or without language impairment. Results: Patients cognitively affected were not different in terms of UBOs volume compared to those preserved (p = 0.35 and p = 0.30, for T2-weighted and FLAIR images, respectively). Similarly, no differences were found between patients with and without language impairment (p = 0.47 and p = 0.40, for the two sequences). Conclusions: The relation between UBOs and cognition in children with NF1 has been already investigated in literature, although leading to conflicting results. Our study expands the current knowledge, showing a lack of correlation between UBOs volume and both cognitive impairment and language disability in NF1 patients.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:001071106300001; volume:124; lastpage:223; numberofpages:230; journal:ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA; https://hdl.handle.net/11588/947480
DOI: 10.1007/s13760-023-02381-0
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/947480; https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-023-02381-0
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; license:Creative commons ; license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.880083F5
Database: BASE