Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Assessing Indonesia and Malaysia’s Legal Responsiveness to Domestic Violence Victims within Islamic Law Framework

Title: Assessing Indonesia and Malaysia’s Legal Responsiveness to Domestic Violence Victims within Islamic Law Framework
Authors: Nuroniyah, Wardah; Al Azkiya, Mohammad Azka; Wahid, Abdul; Labib Shodiq, Fatimah Lubabiyah; Maula, Bani Syarif
Source: Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025); 247-270 ; 2579-4167 ; 1978-6670 ; 10.24090/mnh.v19i2
Publisher Information: Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto
Publication Year: 2025
Subject Terms: Domestic Violence; Islamic Family Law; Victim Protection; Indonesia; Malaysia
Description: This study presents a comparative analysis of Indonesia and Malaysia’s legal frameworks for protecting victims of domestic violence through the lens of Islamic legal principles. It examines both substantive and procedural dimensions in light of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, which emphasize the preservation of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), dignity (ḥifẓ al-‘ird), and family integrity (ḥifẓ al-nasl). Indonesia’s Law No. 23 of 2004 provides broad substantive protection by recognizing various forms of violence physical, psychological, sexual, and economic and extending safeguards to domestic workers. This inclusivity aligns with the Islamic principle of ‘adl (justice) and the duty to uphold human dignity, though weak coordination and limited law enforcement training hinder procedural implementation. In contrast, Malaysia’s Domestic Violence Act 1994 demonstrates stronger procedural responsiveness, particularly in issuing protection orders and promoting inter-agency cooperation. While its narrower scope excludes domestic workers, it reflects dar’ al-mafāsid (prevention of harm) through timely intervention. Malaysia’s dual legal system also integrates Islamic values into judicial practice. The study concludes that Indonesia excels in substantive inclusivity, while Malaysia demonstrates procedural strength. A hybrid model combining Indonesia’s normative scope with Malaysia’s procedural efficiency would better fulfill the Shariah’s holistic objectives of justice and protection.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/almanahij/article/view/13736/4502; https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/almanahij/article/view/13736
DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v19i2.13736
Availability: https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/almanahij/article/view/13736; https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v19i2.13736
Rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Wardah Nuroniyah, Mohammad Azka Al Azkiya, Abdul Wahid, Fatimah Lubabiyah Labib Shodiq, Bani Syarif Maula ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
Accession Number: edsbas.89B60BD2
Database: BASE