Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Comparable outcomes of HSCT upfront and after failure of IST in pediatric aplastic anemia in recent years

Title: Comparable outcomes of HSCT upfront and after failure of IST in pediatric aplastic anemia in recent years
Authors: Andresen, Felicia; Yoshimi, Ayami; Bader, Peter; Bierings, Marc; Bodova, Ivana; Bordon, Victoria; Buechner, Jochen; Burkhardt, Birgit; Dworzak, Michael; Erlacher, Miriam; Kállay, Krisztián; Labarque, Veerle; Locatelli, Franco; Malone, Andrea; Masmas, Tania; Müller, Ingo; Nöllke, Peter; Schmugge, Markus; Pawelec, Katarzyna; Sedlacek, Petr; Sevilla, Julian; Smith, Owen; Stary, Jan; Niemeyer, Charlotte; Strahm, Brigitte
Source: Blood advances. - 10, 6 (2026) , 1992-2005, ISSN: 2473-9537
Publication Year: 2026
Collection: University of Freiburg: FreiDok
Description: We investigated the outcomes of 179 pediatric patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who received up-front hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; n = 87) or received HSCT after failure of immunosuppressive therapy (IST; n = 92). With a median follow-up of 4.0 years (range, 0.2-10.7) after HSCT, 161 patients were alive at last follow-up. The cumulative incidence of graft failure, grade 2 to 4 acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 10%, 18%, and 8%, respectively. Five-year overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free, relapse/rejection-free survival (GRFS) were 89% and 79%, respectively. Patients who received up-front HSCT from a matched sibling donor (MSD) or ≥9/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) both achieved an OS of 95%. OS was superior in patients who received up-front HSCT than those who received HSCT after failure of IST (up-front, 95% [95% CI, 89-100] vs after IST failure, 83% [95% CI,75-91]; P < .01). However, OS in the HSCT group after IST failure improved over time, resulting in comparable OS between up-front HSCT and HSCT after IST failure from 2015 (97% vs 89%; P = .09). Moreover, there was no difference in GRFS of MUD-HSCT comparing patients who received a transplant up front or after IST failure (up-front, 77% vs after IST failure, 76%; P value not significant). Our data highlight the good transplant outcomes of a consecutive pediatric SAA cohort. Although up-front HSCT from a readily available MUD is a viable option if an MSD is not available, HSCT after IST failure from a well-matched unrelated donor also yields favorable outcomes.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: pdf
Language: English
Relation: https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/277270
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018285
Availability: https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/277270; https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-freidok-2772702; https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018285; https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/dnb/download/277270
Rights: free
Accession Number: edsbas.8CEDF0E7
Database: BASE