Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Web Scraping versus Twitter API: A Comparison for a Credibility Analysis

Title: Web Scraping versus Twitter API: A Comparison for a Credibility Analysis
Authors: Dongo I.; Cadinale Y.; Aguilera A.; Martínez F.; Quintero Y.; Barrios S.
Publisher Information: Association for Computing Machinery
Publication Year: 2020
Collection: Repositorio Institucional del Concytec
Subject Terms: API; Credibility; Twitter; Web Scraping; http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.02.04
Description: Twitter is one of the most popular information source available on the Web. Thus, there exist many studies focused on analyzing the credibility of the shared information. Most proposals use either Twitter API or web scraping to extract the data to perform such analysis. Both extraction techniques have advantages and disadvantages. In this work, we present a study to evaluate their performance and behavior. The motivation for this research comes from the necessity to know ways to extract online information in order to analyze in real-time the credibility of the content posted on the Web. To do so, we develop a framework which offers both alternatives of data extraction and implements a previously proposed credibility model. Our framework is implemented as a Google Chrome extension able to analyze tweets in real-time. Results report that both methods produce identical credibility values, when a robust normalization process is applied to the text (i.e., tweet). Moreover, concerning the time performance, web scraping is faster than Twitter API, and it is more flexible in terms of obtaining data; however, web scraping is very sensitive to website changes. © 2020 ACM.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; 01-2019--FONDECYT-BM; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2460; 2-s2.0-85100336680
DOI: 10.1145/3428757.3429104
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2460; https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429104
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.8EDBD77D
Database: BASE