Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Outcomes of Late-Line Systemic Treatment in GIST: Does Sequence Matter?

Title: Outcomes of Late-Line Systemic Treatment in GIST: Does Sequence Matter?
Authors: Prapassorn Thirasastr; Thomas L. Sutton; Cissimol P. Joseph; Heather Lin; Behrang Amini; Skye C. Mayo; Dejka Araujo; Robert S. Benjamin; Anthony P. Conley; John A. Livingston; Joseph Ludwig; Shreyaskumar Patel; Ravin Ratan; Vinod Ravi; Maria A. Zarzour; Elise F. Nassif Haddad; Michael S. Nakazawa; Xiao Zhou; Michael C. Heinrich; Neeta Somaiah
Source: Cancers, Vol 16, Iss 5, p 904 (2024)
Publisher Information: MDPI AG
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Subject Terms: gastrointestinal stomal tumor; ripretinib; avapritinib; Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens; RC254-282
Description: Ripretinib and avapritinib have demonstrated activity in the late-line treatment of gastrointestinal stomal tumors (GISTs). We investigated whether patients previously treated with ripretinib benefit from avapritinib, and vice versa. Patients diagnosed with metastatic/unresectable GIST and treated with both drugs at two institutions in 2000–2021 were included. Patients were grouped by drug sequence: ripretinib–avapritinib (RA) or avapritinib–ripretinib (AR). Radiographic response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Thirty-four patients (17 per group) were identified, with a median age of 48 years. The most common primary site was the small bowel (17/34, 50%), followed by the stomach (10/34, 29.4%). Baseline characteristics and tumor mutations were not significantly different between groups. Response rates (RRs) for ripretinib were 18% for RA and 12% for AR; RRs for avapritinib were 12% for AR and 18% for RA. Median TTPs for ripretinib were 3.65 months (95%CI 2–5.95) for RA and 4.73 months (1.87–15.84) for AR. Median TTPs for avapritinib were 5.39 months (2.86–18.99) for AR and 4.11 months (1.91–11.4) for RA. Median OS rates following RA or AR initiation were 29.63 (95%CI 13.8–50.53) and 33.7 (20.03–50.57) months, respectively. Both ripretinib and avapritinib were efficacious in the late-line treatment of GIST, with no evidence that efficacy depended on sequencing.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/5/904; https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6694; https://doaj.org/article/ff5bb01ba0d7474ca47aa521e68e77e1
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050904
Availability: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16050904; https://doaj.org/article/ff5bb01ba0d7474ca47aa521e68e77e1
Accession Number: edsbas.900EBE1D
Database: BASE