| Title: |
Use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia |
| Authors: |
Unwin, VT; Ahmed, R; Noviyanti, R; Puspitasari, AM; Utami, RAS; Trianty, L; Lukito, T; Syafruddin, D; Poespoprodjo, JR; Santana-Morales, MA; Ter Kuile, FO; Adams, ER |
| Publisher Information: |
BioMed Central |
| Publication Year: |
2026 |
| Collection: |
Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) |
| Description: |
Background: The sensitivity of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria is inadequate for detecting low‑density, often asymptomatic infections, such as those that can occur when screening pregnant women for malaria. The perfor‑ mance of the Alere™ Ultra‑sensitive Malaria Ag Plasmodium falciparum RDT (uRDT) was assessed retrospectively in pregnant women in Indonesia. Methods: The diagnostic performance of the uRDT and the CareStart™ Malaria HRP2/pLDH VOM (Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae) Combo RDT (csRDT) were assessed using 270 stored red blood cell pel‑ lets and plasma samples from asymptomatic pregnant women. These included 112 P. falciparum negative and 158 P. falciparum positive samples detected by a composite test (qPCR, LAMP, nPCR) as reference standard. Diagnostic indicators: sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the level of agreement (kappa) were calculated for comparison. Results: Compared with the reference test, the uRDT had a sensitivity of 19.6% (95% CI 13.9–26.8) and specificity of 98.2% (93.1–99.7%). The csRDT was 22.8% (16.7–30.3) sensitive and 95.5% (89.4–98.3) specific for P. falciparum infec‑ tions. Performance of the uRDT was non‑significantly different to the csRDT (p = 0.169). RDT outcome was stratified by qPCR cycling threshold (Ct), and performance of the RDTs was found to be comparable across parasite loads. Conclusion: The uRDT performed similarly to the currently used csRDTs in detecting P. falciparum infections in asymptomatic pregnant women. In these settings, molecular diagnostics are currently the most sensitive for malaria |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6 |
| Availability: |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6; https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3d1050de-8ac7-45bd-8215-4c85e4529e80 |
| Rights: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; CC Attribution (CC BY) |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.90242716 |
| Database: |
BASE |