Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Legislation, Market Size, and Access to Gender-affirming Genital Surgery in the United States

Title: Legislation, Market Size, and Access to Gender-affirming Genital Surgery in the United States
Authors: Alexander F. Dagi, MPhil; Elizabeth R. Boskey, PhD, MPH; Laura C. Nuzzi, BA; Christine O. Kang, MD, MHS, MS; Oren Ganor, MD; Brian I. Labow, MD; Amir H. Taghinia, MD, MPH, MBA
Source: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open, Vol 9, Iss 2, p e3422 (2021)
Publisher Information: Wolters Kluwer
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Subject Terms: Surgery; RD1-811
Description: Background:. The value of gender-affirming genital surgery (GAGS) has been established for certain transgender or gender non-conforming patients. This study aimed to determine the availability of GAGS by state and region in the United States, and to query possible associations of access to care with healthcare legislation and local market size. Methods:. This was a cross-sectional study reporting on the distribution of hospitals and private practices offering GAGS in the United States. A list of prospective gender surgeons was compiled from 18 online databases. All surgeons were individually verified and were excluded if they did not perform phalloplasty, metoidioplasty, or vaginoplasty. Pertinent legislative and transgender or gender non-conforming population data were derived from the Movement Advancement Project and the Williams Institute. Results:. Seventy-one practices in the United States offered GAGS in 2019. Forty-seven percent of states did not have a practice offering GAGS. A large prospective transgender or gender non-conforming market size increased the odds of GAGS availability in a state more than did local healthcare legislation supporting insurance coverage for gender-affirming care in 2019. Conclusions:. Access to gender-affirming genital surgery was highly disparate in 2019. Factors that predicted access to care, including state healthcare legislation and prospective market sizes, may indicate strategies for overcoming disparities.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003422; https://doaj.org/toc/2169-7574; https://doaj.org/article/124f9d660bbf4b85bedbb0848e1e60f8
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003422
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003422; https://doaj.org/article/124f9d660bbf4b85bedbb0848e1e60f8
Accession Number: edsbas.903E4F56
Database: BASE