Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Interobserver agreement and image quality of functional cardiac ultrasound measures used in a randomised trial of delayed cord clamping in preterm infants

Title: Interobserver agreement and image quality of functional cardiac ultrasound measures used in a randomised trial of delayed cord clamping in preterm infants
Authors: Popat, Himanshu; Robledo, Kristy P; Sebastian, Lucille; Evans, Nicholas; Gill, Andrew; Kluckow, Martin; Sinhal, Sanjay; Waal, Koert de; Tarnow-Mordi, William; Osborn, David
Publisher Information: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Publication Year: 2018
Collection: HighWire Press (Stanford University)
Subject Terms: Original articles
Description: Objective Functional cardiac ultrasound measures are used clinically and in trials for assessing the haemodynamic status of newborn infants. Superior vena cava (SVC) flow and right ventricular output (RVO) are established measures of systemic blood flow on the first postnatal day. The objective was to assess image quality and interobserver agreement of these measures in preterm infants enrolled in a randomised trial of immediate versus delayed cord clamping. Design and setting Image quality and interobserver agreement for SVC flow, RVO and ductus arteriosus (DA) size were assessed on measurements taken at 3–6, 6–12 and 20–28 hours for the first 10 infants enrolled at each of four sites (total 40). Bland-Altman plots were constructed; mean difference (bias) and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated. Potential sources of variation were explored. Results Quality was judged satisfactory for >97% of images. The mean difference and LOA between the observers were 5.4 mL/kg/min and −49.0 to 59.8 mL/kg/min for SVC flow, −26.6 mL/kg/min and −131.4 to 78.2 mL/kg/min for RVO, and 0 mm and −0.8 to 0.8 mm for DA diameter, respectively. The principal source of measurement error for SVC flow was diameter, and for RVO, diameter and velocity time integral. The difference between observers for both SVC and RVO was significantly associated with site. Conclusion Interobserver variability for SVC flow is consistent with that previously reported, but higher for RVO. The findings should be incorporated into clinical practice, training, accreditation and trial design.
Document Type: text
File Description: text/html
Language: English
Relation: http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/103/3/F257; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312006
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312006
Availability: http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/103/3/F257; https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312006
Rights: Copyright (C) 2018, BMJ Publishing Group
Accession Number: edsbas.907A112F
Database: BASE