Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Phase Recognition in Small Incision Cataract Surgery Videos

Title: Phase Recognition in Small Incision Cataract Surgery Videos
Authors: Sachdeva, Bhuvan; Murali, Kaushik; Mueller, Simon; Niharika Prasad, Singri; Schultz, Thomas; Xu, Yanwu; Wintergerst, Maximilian
Publisher Information: Zenodo
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Zenodo
Subject Terms: Temporal Action Segmentation; Cataract Surgery; Deep Learning; Phase Recognition; MICCAI 2025 challenge
Description: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness worldwide, most affecting life in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and the mainly used, most appropriate, and most cost-effective cataract surgical technique for LMICs is small incision cataract surgery (SICS). While algorithms have been developed for automated video analysis of surgical performance parameters for the cataract surgical technique predominantly used in high-income settings, so far there were no datasets nor algorithms for SICS available [1, 2, 3]. This MICCAI challenge introduces the first SICS video dataset and offers teams the opportunity to evaluates effectiveness of their phase recognition algorithms. The dataset of 155 patients was recruited at Sankara Eye Hospital in India. Analysis of surgical phases is important because it allows for quantitative comparison between different surgeons, feedback on identified critical steps, and detection of discrepancies from surgical protocols and because it is the first step for automatic assessment of surgical quality (Sim-OSSCAR) [4]. Our contribution is the first public dataset for SICS holding surgical videos and phase annotations of 155 surgeries with 18 distinct phases. Currently, there are other public cataract surgery phase datasets like Cataract-101 (n=101 videos) or the IEEE Cataracts (n=50 videos) but they only show phacoemulsification surgery which is distinct from SICS in the following ways: SICS involves a larger 6-8 mm incision (2-3 mm for phaco), allowing for easier maneuvering of tools. The surgical phases in SICS are distinct, with steps such as Nucleus Delivery, Nucleus Prolapse, and peritomy not performed in phacoemulsification, which instead includes Trenching, Nucleus Emulsification, and Irrigation/Aspiration [5]. MSICS also utilizes specialized tools such as the Vectis, Dialer, Conjunctival Scissors, Simcoe Cannula, Cautery, and Crescent Blade, which are not used in phaco; conversely, phacoemulsification surgery uses tools like Phaco Probe, Irrigation/Aspiration Probe, and Lens ...
Document Type: other/unknown material
Language: unknown
Relation: https://zenodo.org/records/15087692; oai:zenodo.org:15087692; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15087692
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15087692
Availability: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15087692; https://zenodo.org/records/15087692
Rights: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International ; cc-by-4.0 ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Accession Number: edsbas.9102755C
Database: BASE