Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Arrhythmic Risk Stratification by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Title: Arrhythmic Risk Stratification by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
Authors: Hammersley, DJ; Zegard, A; Androulakis, E; Jones, RE; Okafor, O; Hatipoglu, S; Mach, L; Lota, AS; Khalique, Z; de Marvao, A; Gulati, A; Baruah, R; Guha, K; Ware, JS; Tayal, U; Pennell, DJ; Halliday, BP; Qiu, T; Prasad, SK; Leyva, F
Publisher Information: Elsevier BV
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: St George's University of London: Repository
Description: BACKGROUND: Myocardial fibrosis (MF) forms part of the arrhythmic substrate for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether total myocardial fibrosis (TF) and gray zone fibrosis (GZF), assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, are better than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). METHODS: Patients with NICM in a derivation cohort (n = 866) and a validation cohort (n = 848) underwent quantification of TF and GZF. The primary composite endpoint was sudden cardiac death or VAs (ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia). RESULTS: The primary endpoint was met by 52 of 866 (6.0%) patients in the derivation cohort (median follow-up: 7.5 years; Q1-Q3: 5.2-9.3 years). In competing-risks analyses, MF on visual assessment (MFVA) predicted the primary endpoint (HR: 5.83; 95% CI: 3.15-10.8). Quantified MF measures permitted categorization into 3 risk groups: a TF of >0 g and ≤10 g was associated with an intermediate risk (HR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.99-8.16), and a TF of >10 g was associated with the highest risk (HR: 9.17; 95% CI: 4.64-18.1) compared to patients with no MFVA (lowest risk). Similar trends were observed in the validation cohort. Categorization into these 3 risk groups was achievable using TF or GZF in combination or in isolation. In contrast, LVEF of
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 0735-1097
Relation: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118446/2/1-s2.0-S0735109724081099-main.pdf; https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118446/1/1-s2.0-S0735109724081099-mmc1.pdf; Hammersley, DJ; Zegard, A; Androulakis, E; Jones, RE; Okafor, O; Hatipoglu, S; Mach, L; Lota, AS; Khalique, Z; de Marvao, A; et al. Hammersley, DJ; Zegard, A; Androulakis, E; Jones, RE; Okafor, O; Hatipoglu, S; Mach, L; Lota, AS; Khalique, Z; de Marvao, A; Gulati, A; Baruah, R; Guha, K; Ware, JS; Tayal, U; Pennell, DJ; Halliday, BP; Qiu, T; Prasad, SK; Leyva, F (2024) Arrhythmic Risk Stratification by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 84 (15). pp. 1407-1420. ISSN 0735-1097 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.046 SGUL Authors: Androulakis, Emmanouil
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.046
Availability: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118446/; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.046
Rights: cc_by_4
Accession Number: edsbas.9296C961
Database: BASE