Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Data_Sheet_1_Generalizability of High Frequency Oscillation Evaluations in the Ripple Band.docx

Title: Data_Sheet_1_Generalizability of High Frequency Oscillation Evaluations in the Ripple Band.docx
Authors: Aaron M. Spring; Daniel J. Pittman; Yahya Aghakhani; Jeffrey Jirsch; Neelan Pillay; Luis E. Bello-Espinosa; Colin Josephson; Paolo Federico
Publication Year: 2018
Subject Terms: Neurology and Neuromuscular Diseases; Neurogenetics; high frequency oscillations (HFOs); generalizability; generalizability theory; interrater reliability; interrater variability; epilepsy; intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG); info; geo
Description: Objective: We examined the interrater reliability and generalizability of high-frequency oscillation (HFO) visual evaluations in the ripple (80–250 Hz) band, and established a framework for the transition of HFO analysis to routine clinical care. We were interested in the interrater reliability or epoch generalizability to describe how similar the evaluations were between reviewers, and in the reviewer generalizability to represent the consistency of the internal threshold each individual reviewer. Methods: We studied 41 adult epilepsy patients (mean age: 35.6 years) who underwent intracranial electroencephalography. A morphology detector was designed and used to detect candidate HFO events, lower-threshold events, and distractor events. These events were subsequently presented to six expert reviewers, who visually evaluated events for the presence of HFOs. Generalizability theory was used to characterize the epoch generalizability (interrater reliability) and reviewer generalizability (internal threshold consistency) of visual evaluations, as well as to project the numbers of epochs, reviewers, and datasets required to achieve strong generalizability (threshold of 0.8). Results: The reviewer generalizability was almost perfect (0.983), indicating there were sufficient evaluations to determine the internal threshold of each reviewer. However, the interrater reliability for 6 reviewers (0.588) and pairwise interrater reliability (0.322) were both poor, indicating that the agreement of 6 reviewers is insufficient to reliably establish the presence or absence of individual HFOs. Strong interrater reliability (≥0.8) was projected as requiring a minimum of 17 reviewers, while strong reviewer generalizability could be achieved with
Document Type: still image; dataset
Language: unknown
Relation: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00510.s001
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00510.s001
Availability: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00510.s001
Rights: undefined
Accession Number: edsbas.96D0DE64
Database: BASE