Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

A Pilot Study Testing the Novel Use of a Snake Bite Compression Device for Field Hemostasis and Wound Repair in an Animal Model

Title: A Pilot Study Testing the Novel Use of a Snake Bite Compression Device for Field Hemostasis and Wound Repair in an Animal Model
Authors: Lindquist, David G; Valente, Jonathan H; Hack, Jason B
Source: Military Medicine ; volume 189, issue 3-4, page 461-465 ; ISSN 0026-4075 1930-613X
Publisher Information: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Year: 2024
Description: Introduction A commercially available snake bite device was pilot tested for novel use as a method of hemostasis and wound repair at a noncompressible site in a live swine model. The device is light, is plastic, uses a hook-and-loop strap attachment, and is easily deployed. The device could offer a method for the field repair of an actively bleeding laceration at a noncompressible site in an austere environment. Materials and Methods This was an interventional, prospective, controlled study in a large animal model. The study was approved by the Rhode Island Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Animal Welfare Committee/Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the Lifespan Research Conflict of Interest Committee. Each animal acted as its own control. Blood loss was measured and compared between repairs of standardized incisions with and without the device’s application. The lacerations were sutured closed. Two proceduralists alternated tasks of wound repair versus blood collection. Blood loss was measured by using gauze sponges to capture the blood during a 30-second free-bleeding period and during the repair itself. Using a one sample t-test (the expected difference in blood loss between the two incision repair methods = 0 if the null hypothesis were true), we calculated the mean difference in the deltas between the repair methods. Results The mean delta difference was 3.1 g (SE ± 0.97). The t-test demonstrated that there was a significantly greater blood loss during the standard repair method, t(9) = 3.11, P < 0.01 than during the repair with the device in place (see Fig. 2). A statistical power analysis conducted showed that with a sample size of 10 animals, there was sufficient statistical power to detect this significant effect (β = 0.82, α < 0.05, one-tailed). Conclusions There was statistically significantly less blood loss during the repairs with the device’s application. This feasibility experiment demonstrates that a commercially available snakebite device may ...
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac223
Availability: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usac223; https://academic.oup.com/milmed/article-pdf/189/3-4/461/56773687/usac223.pdf
Rights: https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
Accession Number: edsbas.9D27464E
Database: BASE