Katalog Plus
Bibliothek der Frankfurt UAS
Bald neuer Katalog: sichern Sie sich schon vorab Ihre persönlichen Merklisten im Nutzerkonto: Anleitung.
Dieses Ergebnis aus BASE kann Gästen nicht angezeigt werden.  Login für vollen Zugriff.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Literature Review and State of the Art

Title: Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Literature Review and State of the Art
Authors: Spadafora, Marco; Paganelli, Alessia; Raucci, Margherita; Kaleci, Shaniko; Peris, Ketty; Guida, Stefania; Pellacani, Giovanni; Longo, Caterina
Contributors: Spadafora, Marco; Paganelli, Alessia; Raucci, Margherita; Kaleci, Shaniko; Peris, Ketty; Guida, Stefania; Pellacani, Giovanni; Longo, Caterina
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: Archivio della ricerca dell'Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia (Unimore: IRIS)
Subject Terms: cSCC; immunotherapy; neoadjuvant; non-melanoma skin cancer; oncology; skin cancer; squamous cell carcinoma; therapy
Description: Background/Objectives:Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a prevalent skin cancer with increasing incidence worldwide. High-risk cSCCs often require extensive surgical treatments, which can impair anatomical function and aesthetics. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as cemiplimab and pembrolizumab, has emerged as a promising approach to enhance tumor control and surgical outcomes. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in high-risk cSCC. Methods: A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy for cSCC were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched up to September 2024 using predefined terms. Recorded findings were pathological/radiological response, 1-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Statistical analysis included fixed- and random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using Cochran’s Q statistic and the I2 index. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled pathologic response rate was 72.2% (95% CI: 57.7–84.6), and the radiological response rate was 54.8% (95% CI: 38.6–70.5), with moderate heterogeneity. Pooled 1-year DFS and OS proportions were 91.1% (95% CI: 85.0–95.3) and 90.6% (95% CI: 85.1–95.0), respectively, demonstrating homogeneity across studies. Adverse events were consistent with previously reported immune-related toxicities, with rare severe events. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for high-risk cSCC, with high pathologic response rates and high survival outcomes. However, standardization of treatment protocols and further trials are needed to optimize efficacy, ensure safety, and assess long-term benefits.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: English
Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/40002232; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:001429666300001; volume:17; issue:4; firstpage:0; lastpage:0; journal:CANCERS; https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1383891
DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040637
Availability: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1383891; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040637
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; license:[IR] creative-commons ; license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.9DB8AFFE
Database: BASE