| Title: |
Diagnostic accuracy of magnified dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy in assessing melanocytic lesions |
| Authors: |
Guida, Stefania; Ciardo, Silvana; Kaleci, Shaniko; Farnetani, Francesca; Spadafora, Marco; Radi, Giulia; Rossi, Renato; Molinelli, Elisa; Longhitano, Sabrina; Conforti, Claudio; Cantisani, Carmen; Chello, Camilla; Simonetti, Oriana; Offidani, Anna Maria; Rubegni, Pietro; Rongioletti, Franco; Longo, Caterina; Cinotti, Elisa; Pellacani, Giovanni |
| Contributors: |
Guida, Stefania; Ciardo, Silvana; Kaleci, Shaniko; Farnetani, Francesca; Spadafora, Marco; Radi, Giulia; Rossi, Renato; Molinelli, Elisa; Longhitano, Sabrina; Conforti, Claudio; Cantisani, Carmen; Chello, Camilla; Simonetti, Oriana; Offidani, Anna Maria; Rubegni, Pietro; Rongioletti, Franco; Longo, Caterina; Cinotti, Elisa; Pellacani, Giovanni |
| Publisher Information: |
Mattioli 1885 |
| Publication Year: |
2025 |
| Collection: |
Sapienza Università di Roma: CINECA IRIS |
| Subject Terms: |
diagnostic accuracy; magnified dermoscopy; melanocytic lesion; melanoma; reflectance confocal microscopy |
| Description: |
Introduction: Magnified dermoscopy (MD), or optical super-high magnification dermoscopy, is an emerging technique in dermatology. Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the distribution of conventional dermoscopy, MD, and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) features in dermoscopically equivocal pigmented lesions and to estimate their diagnostic accuracy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of conventional dermoscopic (20x), MD (400x), and RCM images of dermoscopically equivocal pigmented lesions, diagnosed as either nevi or melanoma, was performed. Distribution of features, sensitivity, and specificity for dermoscopy, MD, RCM, and a combination of these last two with conventional dermoscopy was estimated. Results: A total of 74 nevi and 20 melanomas were included in the analysis. A positive correlation was observed between seven-point checklist in conventional dermoscopy and the diagnosis of melanoma. With MD, a significant correlation between dots, non-edged papillae, and melanoma was observed, but the technique did not have a significant impact on diagnostic accuracy as compared to traditional dermoscopy. On the other hand, RCM, alone or in combination with traditional dermoscopy, proved to increase diagnostic accuracy, in particular, specificity for melanoma diagnosis. Conclusions: RCM has a defined role in increasing diagnostic accuracy of doubtful dermoscopic lesions, while the role of MD in clinical practice has yet to be defined, and methodologic standardization as well as a revision of terminology is encouraged to improve the recognition of features. |
| Document Type: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| Language: |
English |
| Relation: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/40790441; volume:15; issue:3; numberofpages:7; journal:DERMATOLOGY PRACTICAL & CONCEPTUAL; https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1744775 |
| DOI: |
10.5826/dpc.1503a5253 |
| Availability: |
https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1744775; https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1503a5253 |
| Rights: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; license:Creative commons ; license uri:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| Accession Number: |
edsbas.9F0FB6C2 |
| Database: |
BASE |